Hi all,
Reminder we have our regular SPDX-legal meeting tomorrow at noon US
eastern time at https://meet.jit.si/SPDXLegalMeeting
As for agenda:
1) We will have Vedant Jolly - our GSoC student working on improvements
and increased functionality for the SPDX license submission tool. You
can
They probably have the same meaning, although it may depend on the subject of
the sentence and what it is attached to. Example: “this page is in the public
domain” attached to a file, or a program consisting of a number of different
files. In that circumstance, what’s PD, and is anything not.
On 5/24/23 3:18 PM, McCoy Smith wrote:
I’m not sure you can easily find some sort of “these are the
characteristics that make a public domain dedication effect” analysis,
and it might be expensive to put together. I think CC looked into this
when they created CC0 but their dedication is
On 5/11/23 7:22 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2023, 7:07 AM Steve Winslow wrote:
Thanks all for the thoughts and conversation on this topic over
the past few days. Would love to continue to see others’ thoughts
on this!
A few comments from me:
Trying to break
On 5/10/23 9:39 AM, Mary Hardy (CELA) wrote:
I see the disadvantages, but what are the advantages to having one
SPDX identifier that applies to many public domain references?
advantage would be avoiding many, many new SPDX identifiers or
LicenseRef- for things that are essentially the
I’m not sure you can easily find some sort of “these are the characteristics
that make a public domain dedication effect” analysis, and it might be
expensive to put together. I think CC looked into this when they created CC0
but their dedication is pretty wordy, probably to cover every possible
On 5/10/23 2:00 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 22:37 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 2:38 PM McCoy Smith wrote:
FWIW, maybe this is an opportunity for SPDX to lead?
Most of these look similar, but not the same. I’m guessing a lot of
the similar ones
On 5/9/23 12:34 PM, McCoy Smith wrote:
FWIW, maybe this is an opportunity for SPDX to lead?
Most of these look similar, but not the same. I’m guessing a lot of
the similar ones would have the same legal effect, although the more
dissimilar ones, maybe not (depending on where you are, and as
On 5/9/23 10:56 AM, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
Hi Jilayne:
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 5:34 AM J Lovejoy wrote:
Some time ago, I raised the issue of the possibility of finding a proliferation of
"public domain "dedication" texts in the course of Fedora reviewing package
license info to adopt
Thanks for the various feedback on this, everyone!
Responding in order... see below
On 5/8/23 10:43 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mon, May 8, 2023, 9:34 PM J Lovejoy wrote:
Hi SPDX-legal
Some time ago, I raised the issue of the possibility of finding a
proliferation of "public
10 matches
Mail list logo
