> -Original Message-
> From: W. Trevor King [mailto:wk...@tremily.us]
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 12:44 PM
> To: Richard Fontana; J Lovejoy
> Cc: Gary O'Neall; spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org; SPDX-legal
> Subject: Re: Providing access to FSF license metadata
>
> On
W. Trevor King wrote:
> They also list the Expat license as free and GPL-compatible [5], and
> it matches the SPDX MIT [6]. So you can say the FSF considers the
> SPDX MIT free and GPL-compatible.
Ah right - so not as interesting an example as others I was thinking
of. I've been thinking about
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:30:18PM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> By the bye, one thing I'd find useful, either inside or outside of
> SPDX, is some notion of correspondence of an FSF-approved license
> with a counterpart OSI-approved, or SPDX-recognized, license.
>
> To illustrate, consider the
SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensou...@jilayne.com
> On Oct 13, 2017, at 12:02 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:20:33AM -0700, Gary O'Neall wrote:
>> There is a request by the FSF and approved by the legal team to add
>> a property to the listed licenses