RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released

Yes, I confirm it’s fixed. From: Gary O'Neall [mailto:g...@sourceauditor.com] Sent: 21 April 2016 17:38 To: Sam Ellis; 'J Lovejoy'; 'Zavras, Alexios' Cc: 'SPDX-legal'; 'SPDX-general' Subject: RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released Hi Sam, I believe this was resolved a couple weeks back. I just

RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released

Ellis Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 10:05 AM To: J Lovejoy; Zavras, Alexios Cc: SPDX-legal; SPDX-general Subject: RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released I see an error reported at the top of this page: https://spdx.org/licenses/Artistic-2.0 The error is: error on line 213 at column 22

RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released

: RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released Yes, it is J The copyright symbol in the footer (in “© 2016 SPDX Workgroup”) raises the parse error, but it is because without the .html extension the browser thinks it gets XML instead of HTML. -- zvr From: J Lovejoy [mailto:opensou

RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released

. Gary From: Zavras, Alexios [mailto:alexios.zav...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 10:56 AM To: J Lovejoy; Gary O'Neall Cc: SPDX-legal; Sam Ellis Subject: RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released Yes, it is J The copyright symbol in the footer (in “© 2016 SPDX Workgroup”) raises the parse

RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released

To: Sam Ellis <sam.el...@arm.com> Cc: Zavras, Alexios <alexios.zav...@intel.com>; SPDX-legal <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>; Gary O'Neall <g...@sourceauditor.com> Subject: Re: SPDX License List v2.4 released I’m removing the general list from this thread, as we can sort ou

Re: SPDX License List v2.4 released

boun...@lists.spdx.org > <mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org> > [mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org > <mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org>] On Behalf Of J Lovejoy > Sent: 08 April 2016 17:36 > To: Zavras, Alexios > Cc: SPDX-legal; SPDX-general

Re: SPDX License List v2.4 released

Thanks for catching this Alexios - you are right as to where the error is coming from… I’ll work with Gary to fix this. Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensou...@jilayne.com > On Apr 8, 2016, at 6:52 AM, Zavras, Alexios wrote: > > This license is empty: 

RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released

This license is empty: http://spdx.org/licenses/NLOD-1.0.html I assume because the reference (at least in the Excel file) is to "NLOD-1..txt" instead of "NLOD-1.0.txt". -- zvr From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org [mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of J Lovejoy Sent:

Re: SPDX License List v2.4 released

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gary O'Neall wrote: > Greetings all - The site has now been updated with conforming HTML. Thank you Gary. That was quick! -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne +1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com DejaCode : What's in your code?! at

RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released

day or so. Gary > -Original Message- > From: spdx-boun...@lists.spdx.org [mailto:spdx-boun...@lists.spdx.org] > On Behalf Of Philippe Ombredanne > Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 6:45 AM > To: SPDX-legal > Cc: SPDX-general > Subject: Re: SPDX License List v2.4 releas