Hi all,
We have our regular call in about half hour at
https://meet.jit.si/SPDXLegalMeeting
Please review the following issues to cover during the call:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1992
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1944
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2043
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2055
The following need review, but I don't think they need discussion - please take
time to contribute by reviewing as to whether they should be added to the SPDX
License List
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2026 (needs one more person to
review)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2048 (needs one more person to
review)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2049
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2050
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2056
Thanks,
Jilayne
On 8/4/23 12:59 PM, J Lovejoy wrote:
Hi SPDX-legal,
We currently have 24 license requests that need review. Links below, please
contribute your valuable input! It’d be preferable if to all decisions were
just Steve and I.
Reminder - for those license request issues with the label “used in major
distro” - this means that the license has been determined to meet the free
software license guidelines of either Debian or Fedora (or both) and is used in
one of those distros, which also generally means the license meets two of the
more important SPDX License inclusion guidelines. In this case, we 2 SPDX-legal
members to review and approve for the license to be accepted.
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1992
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1944
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2026 (needs one more person to
review)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2039
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2042 (needs one more person to
review)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2043 (needs one more person to
review)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2048 (needs one more person to
review)
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2049
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2050
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2055
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2056
Other issues that may implicate decisions about matching markup can be found at
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22XML+markup+change%22
Thanks,
Jilayne
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3441): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/3441
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/100665621/21656
Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/leave/2655900/21656/2011363115/xyzzy
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
