Re: Past and preview License List releases (was: 3.1 release)

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:04:05PM -0400, Brad Edmondson wrote: > I'm in favor of solving this (making html available for old versions > of the license list). I think it will help with adoption too, > especially as we move back to a more frequent release cadence. > > Perhaps add to the errata

New License Request: TU-Berlin

Proposed Full Name: Technische Universitaet Berlin License Permissive Technische Universitaet Berlin License [???] Proposed Short Identifier: TU-Berlin-1.0 TU-Berlin-2.0 URL references: 1.0: http://alpha.tmit.bme.hu/pub/audio/gsm-1.0/copyrigh

Re: New License/Exception Request: MIT No Attribution

Mark, Do I understand correctly then, that Amazon created this license? While I understand the rationale (as you explained below), which makes sense and I can see others having a similar goal. But, I’m wondering why Amazon made a new license, instead of using something that reaches the same

meeting at top of the hour

same time, same channel: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team we’ll look at what needs to be done for the 3.1 release and try to tie those things up during the call. As per my last email: my bandwidth is extremely limited, so I’m looking for people to

RE: New License/Exception Request: MIT No Attribution

Hello J, While Amazon did create this license, we also found a reference to an even earlier identical independent invention of the same license text, and included a link to that document.As to why MIT-0 instead of BSD0?, I do not know, it was before my time. There may have been an

RE: Request to add OSCAT License to the SPDX license list

Hi, Dennis, Sorry, I just found your reply now when checking old mail folders. The responsibilities in our house changed, and some things got lost. ☹ As I said, I am not the author of the license, nor affiliated with the project. We are just redistributing the OSCAT library, thus I do not have

meeting minutes

Hi all, I’ve posted the meeting minutes and can sum them up here: We went through all open PRs for 3.1 release and resolved at https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML . Tagged anything else for 3.2 or later release. Did same with issues. The 3.1

Re: Past and preview License List releases (was: 3.1 release)

I'm in favor of solving this (making html available for old versions of the license list). I think it will help with adoption too, especially as we move back to a more frequent release cadence. Perhaps add to the errata issue? Or file a separate issue? -- Brad Edmondson, *Esq.* 512-673-8782 |