On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 11:27:51AM -0700, g...@sourceauditor.com wrote:
> 3) [packename].spdx where packagename is the name of the package
>
> Note that #3 is currently in use.
My concern with the current SPDXParser.spdx [1] is that it is not
immediately obvious that the file applies to the
I would like to bring an issue that was raised on the SPDX tools github repo
regarding the name of the SPDX file to the larger mailing list:
https://github.com/spdx/tools/issues/107#issuecomment-321548533
Background: Although an SPDX file was present in the repo, it was not easily
found.
