Re: A non-standard permissive license

2013-03-07 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
Ok, so let me see if I can sum up the issues that have been brought up on this thread… 1) Scott asks if anyone has seen this license 2) should we add it to list? 3) possible need for allowing other list maintainers to use a short identifier that works with SPDX and SPDX LIcense List 4)

Re: Possible need for allowing other list maintainers to use a short identifier that works with SPDX and SPDX LIcense List

2013-03-14 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
We tried to discuss this for a bit on the call today, but realized more info was really needed to have a meaningful discussion. Perhaps Guillaume or Daniel could flesh out a use case scenario, as well as more details on how this would work, what it would take to implement, etc. Seems like

Re:

2013-06-19 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
Gary, et al. Did you already update with Daniel's suggstions? I am also wondering if the wiki version or the Word version is the master? As this is to become part of the spec, perhaps just use the wiki until it's finalized and then pass over to Kate to include in the spec? I'd like to be

Re: License: spdx-license=IDENTIFIER

2013-10-02 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
. However, I don't see anything about this documented in these minutes: Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 14:37 (EDT) on Thursday: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2013-09-25 these minutes are for the legal team meeting on 9/25 during which I did a brief recap of the various meetings

meta-tag page

2013-10-03 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
I just updated the meta-tag proposal page on the Wiki in the introduction section. We had discussed on the general meeting this morning, that this was needed. Have a look and see what you think. http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/SPDX_Meta_Tags Jilayne Lovejoy SPDX Legal Team lead

Re: meta-tag page

2013-10-03 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
should be. David's point about the short identifiers not being completely immutable is a good one as well. As much as we aim to make them so, extreme statements like that are usually an invite for contradiction later :) Jilayne Lovejoy SPDX Legal Team lead lovejoyl...@gmail.com On Oct 3, 2013

Re: SPDX meta-tag for implicit license terms

2013-12-19 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
I would agree with Oliver's point, as well as Kate's - that we should be consistent with what is already defined in the standard. Oliver has concisely summarized the information you would expect to find in the SPDX document for the file level information for a file that has no license info in

Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX short-form IDs site

2018-04-11 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
ins...@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 2:52 PM To: Jilayne Lovejoy <opensou...@jilayne.com> Cc: John Sullivan <jo...@fsf.org>, "spdx-tech@lists.spdx.org" <spdx-tech@lists.spdx.org> Subject: Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX short-form IDs site Thanks all (and Jilayne,

Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX short-form IDs site

2018-04-11 Thread Jilayne Lovejoy
Hi John, Steve Winslow writes: > Hello all, > > I've been working on a few pages on the SPDX website on why and how to use > SPDX short-form IDs. This is intended to be developer-focused, usable by > someone who isn't otherwise