Ok, so let me see if I can sum up the issues that have been brought up on this
1) Scott asks if anyone has seen this license
2) should we add it to list?
3) possible need for allowing other list maintainers to use a short identifier
that works with SPDX and SPDX LIcense List
We tried to discuss this for a bit on the call today, but realized more
info was really needed to have a meaningful discussion. Perhaps Guillaume
or Daniel could flesh out a use case scenario, as well as more details on
how this would work, what it would take to implement, etc.
Gary, et al.
Did you already update with Daniel's suggstions? I am also wondering if the
wiki version or the Word version is the master? As this is to become part of
the spec, perhaps just use the wiki until it's finalized and then pass over to
Kate to include in the spec? I'd like to be
However, I don't see anything about this documented in these minutes:
Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 14:37 (EDT) on Thursday:
these minutes are for the legal team meeting on 9/25 during which I did a brief
recap of the various meetings
I just updated the meta-tag proposal page on the Wiki in the introduction
section. We had discussed on the general meeting this morning, that this was
needed. Have a look and see what you think.
SPDX Legal Team lead
David's point about the short identifiers not being completely immutable is a
good one as well. As much as we aim to make them so, extreme statements like
that are usually an invite for contradiction later :)
SPDX Legal Team lead
On Oct 3, 2013
I would agree with Oliver's point, as well as Kate's - that we should be
consistent with what is already defined in the standard. Oliver has concisely
summarized the information you would expect to find in the SPDX document for
the file level information for a file that has no license info in
Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 2:52 PM
To: Jilayne Lovejoy <opensou...@jilayne.com>
Cc: John Sullivan <jo...@fsf.org>, "email@example.com"
Subject: Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX short-form IDs site
Thanks all (and Jilayne,
Steve Winslow writes:
> Hello all,
> I've been working on a few pages on the SPDX website on why and how to use
> SPDX short-form IDs. This is intended to be developer-focused, usable by
> someone who isn't otherwise