On 27-Dec-06, at 11:11 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
> I think using "cancel" would add consistency between the modes, any
> reason I'm not seeing why it is a bad choice?
Because then, only from the message contents, the RP wouldn't be able
to distinguish between responses to immediate and non-im
On 28-Dec-06, at 3:47 PM, David Recordon wrote:
> Sitting here in Seattle with Drummond and looking through the
> spec. Section
> 7.3.3 says:
> HTML-based discovery MUST be supported by Relying Parties. HTML-
> based discovery is only usable for discovery of Claimed Identifiers.
> OP Id
On 12/28/06, David Recordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a bit confusing to parse so we were looking at re-wording it. Issue
> is "Claimed Identifier" is defined as possibly being a "User-Supplied
> Identifier" which in turn can be an "OP Identifier" thus making this
> paragraph fall apart
Sitting here in Seattle with Drummond and looking through the spec. Section
7.3.3 says:
HTML-based discovery MUST be supported by Relying Parties. HTML-
based discovery is only usable for discovery of Claimed Identifiers.
OP Identifiers must be XRIs or URLs that support XRDS discovery.
Th
