Re: XRDS vs. DNS level identity (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Handle http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Style Identifiers)

2006-11-09 Thread Johannes Ernst
To: Johannes Ernst Cc: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; specs@openid.net; general Subject: Re: XRDS vs. DNS level identity (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Handle http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Style Identifiers) I agree with Johannes here. DNS is not user accessible (for good reason) Documents on a web server are relatively

RE: XRDS vs. DNS level identity (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Handle http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Style Identifiers)

2006-11-08 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
; 'David Fuelling' Cc: specs@openid.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: XRDS vs. DNS level identity (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Handle http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Style Identifiers) Phillip, Please don't shoot me -- I am just the messenger -- but a year-long effort (Yadis) went into the design

Re: XRDS vs. DNS level identity (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Handle http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Style Identifiers)

2006-11-08 Thread Dick Hardt
; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: XRDS vs. DNS level identity (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Handle http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Style Identifiers) Phillip, Please don't shoot me -- I am just the messenger -- but a year-long effort (Yadis) went into the design and deployment of XRDS documents as the discovery

RE: XRDS vs. DNS level identity (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Handle http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Style Identifiers)

2006-11-08 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
: Thursday, November 09, 2006 2:05 AM To: Johannes Ernst Cc: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; specs@openid.net; general Subject: Re: XRDS vs. DNS level identity (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Handle http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Style Identifiers) I agree with Johannes here. DNS is not user accessible (for good reason