Sitting here in Seattle with Drummond and looking through the spec. Section
7.3.3 says:
HTML-based discovery MUST be supported by Relying Parties. HTML-
based discovery is only usable for discovery of Claimed Identifiers.
OP Identifiers must be XRIs or URLs that support XRDS discovery.
On 12/28/06, David Recordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is a bit confusing to parse so we were looking at re-wording it. Issue
is Claimed Identifier is defined as possibly being a User-Supplied
Identifier which in turn can be an OP Identifier thus making this
paragraph fall apart.
From
On 28-Dec-06, at 3:47 PM, David Recordon wrote:
Sitting here in Seattle with Drummond and looking through the
spec. Section
7.3.3 says:
HTML-based discovery MUST be supported by Relying Parties. HTML-
based discovery is only usable for discovery of Claimed Identifiers.
OP
On 27-Dec-06, at 11:11 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
I think using cancel would add consistency between the modes, any
reason I'm not seeing why it is a bad choice?
Because then, only from the message contents, the RP wouldn't be able
to distinguish between responses to immediate and
