Thanks Paul for this feed back.
Running such a thin client on a mobile device is not that easy ... at
least on a short term basis : 1) mobile browsers do not allow for
plugins ..2) having endusers to download and install third party apps is
a real challenge !
That's why i'm looking for an api
Here are some more thoughts.
I agree with Laurent, 3rd party applications on mobiles are a pain - too
many architectures to deal with. Especially if you are trying to do
something interesting you can't do with J2ME + JSRxxx. Windows mobile will
be no problem when (if) it gets cardspace as there
Hey all,
We're currently in the process of changing all of the SVN URLs to be
in the form of http://svn.openid.net/. New URLs are:
http://svn.openid.net/ - WebSVN
http://svn.openid.net/repos/website/
http://svn.openid.net/repos/specifications/
Sorry for the change,
--David
# Yep, the idea is for the PAPE spec to define a few generic and
# agreed upon policies and then RPs and OPs can create others. Thus
# if there isn't agreement on a policy, there would be multiple policy
# URIs. Same concept as in Attribute Exchange.
Using policy URIs to indicate certain modes