Re: Backporting the 2.0 extension mechanism to 1.1

2008-08-12 Thread Martin Atkins
Nat Sakimura wrote: Actially, that interpretation is not right. In draft 3, we have made it clear. Draft 3 now seems to say: For the purposes of this document and when constructing OpenID 1.1 and 2.0 messages, the extension namespace alias SHALL be pape. Which now seems to

Email Address to URL Transformation

2008-08-12 Thread Arshad Khan
Does OpenID 2.0 support 'Email Address to URL Transformation (EAUT)? There is some info on this page of what EAUT is: http://blog.vidoop.com/archives/139 Has Vidoop developed this outside OpenID 2.0 framework? Thanks. Arshad

Re: Email Address to URL Transformation

2008-08-12 Thread sakimura
Formal answer is no. I think Vidoop will eventually propose to form a working group on this eventually, but that is only my guess. =nat On 8/13/08, Arshad Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does OpenID 2.0 support 'Email Address to URL Transformation (EAUT)? There is some info on this page of

Re: Backporting the 2.0 extension mechanism to 1.1

2008-08-12 Thread sakimura
The preceding sentence goes: The actual extension namespace alias should be determined on a per-message basis by the party composing the messages, in such a manner as to avoid conflicts between multiple extensions. Thus the intent of the For the purposes of this document and when

Re: Backporting the 2.0 extension mechanism to 1.1

2008-08-12 Thread James Henstridge
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Martin Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Net::OpenID::Consumer perl library as it currently stands will not support PAPE in 1.1-mode messages since the openid.ns.alias mechanism is only used in 2.0 mode. I'd like to change this to use the 2.0 scheme in 1.1