RE: Request for comments: Sorting fields in signature generation

2006-09-27 Thread Granqvist, Hans
I think the real topic of this discussion is whether or not multiple parameters with the same name should be allowed by the specification. I'd support the motion of not doing that. Johannes, just to clarify, are you against allowing multiple same-name params? Hans

featuritis for existing form handlers (was: Sorting fields in signature generation)

2006-09-27 Thread Kevin Turner
Re-writing all your applications every time a new technology pops up is not a very efficient use of resources. New technologies that can leverage an existing install base will likely fare better than those that demand a completely clean slate. So I won't argue that existing applications are

Re: Request for comments: Sorting fields in signature generation - Call for votes

2006-09-27 Thread Josh Hoyt
On 9/27/06, Marius Scurtescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: please keep in mind that we are not asking for some fancy new technology or feature, just conformance with a very basic an wide spread convention of handling parameters in HTTP/HTML. As Kevin pointed out, we are not working on the HTTP/HTML

Re: Request for comments: Sorting fields in signature generation

2006-09-27 Thread Josh Hoyt
On 9/27/06, Johnny Bufu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Huh? I don't see anything in that section about a requirement to echo back parameters. Not a requirement, but I read the second paragraph as implying they can/could be used. An IdP is not forbidden from echoing back any unknown parameters it