Re[2]: Consolidated Delegate Proposal

2006-10-11 Thread Chris Drake
Martin wrote: I'm surprised that our resident privacy advocates aren't making a bigger deal out of this. (If the privacy advocates have no problem then I'll let this go, since this isn't a use case I feel particularly strongly about myself.) Dick wrote: I was supportive of keeping the

Re: Re[2]: Consolidated Delegate Proposal

2006-10-11 Thread Dick Hardt
+1 Well said Chris. On 10-Oct-06, at 11:22 PM, Chris Drake wrote: This is backwards: Users have already chosen the IdP whom they trust to look after their identity and privacy: and except for the unlikely double-blind scenarios, no user will want to hide RP info and usage from their own