Re: [OpenID] OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-06 Thread Gavin Baumanis
Again - as the new guy...
 
It gives me a pretty thorough understanding of what's expected.
With regards to your Open Issue (2), Since it is from the community
perspective would it not be appropriate to have;
 
(obviously my  text will require some tweaking )
"When in doubt - Bring to our attention the possibility of a conflict
at the earliest time"
 
As a a follow-up question - and I am assuming it is a "legal" question 
- but does the act of disclosing a conflict / possible conflict have any
possible side-effect along the lines of disclosing
commercial-in-confidence information etc?
 

>>> "Recordon, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thursday, December 07,
2006 06:42 >>>
Hey guys,
Been working with Gabe, and others, on starting to draft an IPR Policy
for OpenID specifications.  We'd appreciate feedback in terms of if
what
is written captures the correct intent of the community?  We realize
the
language isn't technically as tight as it needs to be, though first
want
to make sure it is saying the right thing.  It is largely based on the
IPR Policy for Microformats.

http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/IPR_Policy 

Thanks,
--David
___
general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs


Re: [OpenID] Spec Development Process Write-up

2006-12-06 Thread Gavin Baumanis
David,
 
I don't know if its misrepresenting anything or not (I am pretty green
when it comes to the IETF / their processes and creating a
specification...
 
But from my "totally new" perspective it reads easily and gives me the
basic information I need to know / want to know with regards to what is
"official" / what is under consideration and how I contribute / ask
questions as required.
 
If there was the complete intention - then I would say it is
successfully completing its job.
 


>>> "Recordon, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thursday, December 07,
2006 05:23 >>>
Added a section about how specs evolve from creation to being
"official".  Anything I'm mis-representing?
http://openid.net/specs.bml 

--David
___
general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs


RE: OpenID Simple Registration 1.1 - Draft 1

2006-12-06 Thread Recordon, David
Done, commit 172.

--David 

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Daugherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 1:41 PM
To: Recordon, David
Cc: specs@openid.net
Subject: Re: OpenID Simple Registration 1.1 - Draft 1

# Please review and +1 or -1 for final draft.  Only change is adding #
namespace parameters to request and response to work as a 2.0 #
extension.  It also doesn't hurt to have these parameters in 1.1 #
messages.

+1, but please change my email address in the authors list to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks,

--
  Jonathan Daugherty
  JanRain, Inc.

___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs


Re: OpenID Simple Registration 1.1 - Draft 1

2006-12-06 Thread Jonathan Daugherty
# Please review and +1 or -1 for final draft.  Only change is adding
# namespace parameters to request and response to work as a 2.0
# extension.  It also doesn't hurt to have these parameters in 1.1
# messages.

+1, but please change my email address in the authors list to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks,

-- 
  Jonathan Daugherty
  JanRain, Inc.
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs


OpenID Simple Registration 1.1 - Draft 1

2006-12-06 Thread Recordon, David
Please review and +1 or -1 for final draft.  Only change is adding
namespace parameters to request and response to work as a 2.0 extension.
It also doesn't hurt to have these parameters in 1.1 messages.

Draft:
http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-extension-1_1-01.html

Diff:
http://openid.net/svn/comp.php?repname=specifications&path=&compare%5B%5
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&compare%5B%5D=%2Fsimple_regis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks,
--David
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs


OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-06 Thread Recordon, David
Hey guys,
Been working with Gabe, and others, on starting to draft an IPR Policy
for OpenID specifications.  We'd appreciate feedback in terms of if what
is written captures the correct intent of the community?  We realize the
language isn't technically as tight as it needs to be, though first want
to make sure it is saying the right thing.  It is largely based on the
IPR Policy for Microformats.

http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/IPR_Policy

Thanks,
--David
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs


Spec Development Process Write-up

2006-12-06 Thread Recordon, David
Added a section about how specs evolve from creation to being
"official".  Anything I'm mis-representing?
http://openid.net/specs.bml

--David
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs