Gabe Wachob wrote:
Hi Mart-
I'm trying to figure out if what you are proposing covers the same
use case that I discussed at
http://openid.net/pipermail/general/2007-March/002005.html
I'm not clear actually what you are trying to do with HTTP
Authentication, and it may be
On 9-Apr-07, at 8:23 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
Is there a list anywhere? I didn't find one in the documents and I
think this list would benefit everyone in the conversation. I'm
just curious as to the fields you're expecting an OP to implement.
While at Standard, I ended up hosting our
On 9-Apr-07, at 5:24 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
Yes, I agree an upgrade path from SREG is needed. We could however do
something as simple as
http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-
extension-1_0.html#ni
ckname for the existing SREG fields.
by making this a fragment, you force
On 10-Apr-07, at 12:21 AM, Dick Hardt wrote:
On 9-Apr-07, at 5:24 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
Yes, I agree an upgrade path from SREG is needed. We could
however do
something as simple as
http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-
extension-1_0.html#nickname for the existing SREG
On 10-Apr-07, at 9:39 AM, Josh Hoyt wrote:
On 4/10/07, Rowan Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since
the main difference I'm seeing at the moment is that SREG doesn't
specifically request each value it wants, except in
openid.sreg.required
and openid.sreg.optional.
Um, that is exactly how
On 9-Apr-07, at 5:24 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
Yes, I agree an upgrade path from SREG is needed. We could however do
something as simple as
http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-
extension-1_0.html#ni
ckname for the existing SREG fields.
Dick wrote:
by making this a
+1 as well. Very well articulated.
An interesting side note: XRI supports a # fragment for backward
compatibility with URI/IRI syntax, but in practice its rarely used since XRI
syntax is already polyarchical, i.e., any XRI can be put in the context of
another XRI. # is just one such context
Thanks everyone for the good feedback and discussions during the last
week. I went through the messages and added clarifications and
modifications for the issues where there seemed to be consensus.
Since there were a handful of changes, I've tagged the result and
asked David to put draft 5
