On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:19:08AM -0700, Josh Hoyt wrote:
On 5/24/07, Peter Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't the spec clarify what is required for an HTML discovery to
uphold an assertion that triggers 11.2's discovery process?
The spec as it is currently written does not
On 25-May-07, at 11:18 AM, Peter Watkins wrote:
It's too bad Yadis doesn't allow embedding the XRDS document in
something like a META tag to avoid that second Yadis HTTP request
If you send an Accept header that includes application/xrds+xml
the OP can return the XRDS document on the first
Josh,
On 24-May-07, at 4:19 PM, Josh Hoyt wrote:
Please review the additions. If you'd like to see the
specific changes, you can look at the diffs in revision control[3].
Looks good to me. One minor issue about the wording - we have now two
return URL verifications: one done by the OP and a
On 24-May-07, at 5:54 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
I guess since we're unable to fully resolve this issue from a
technical
perspective, and no I don't have a better technical solution, I'm
wondering if this should actually be an extension to the core protocol
versus seeming like a
Johnny Bufu wrote:
While at IIW, I asked around what people thought about the encoding
mechanisms we've added recently, in order to allow for transferring
any data types. The consensus was that everyone would prefer
something simpler and lighter.
So I've rewritten the encoding section,
