Re: OpenID 2.0 finalization progress

2007-10-19 Thread Pat Patterson
+1 FWIW Interested parties, feel free to use the Sun OpenID NAC as a model - http://www.sun.com/software/standards/persistent/openid/nac.xml Cheers, Pat On Oct 19, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Johannes Ernst wrote: Some years ago, if I recall correctly, Rambus participated in an open industry

RE: OpenID 2.0 finalization progress

2007-10-19 Thread Gabe Wachob
I've already suggested that to the OAuth community and they are heartily taking up that suggestion... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Patterson Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:36 PM To: Johannes Ernst Cc: specs@openid.net

Re: OpenID 2.0 finalization progress

2007-10-19 Thread Johannes Ernst
Some years ago, if I recall correctly, Rambus participated in an open industry process (or so the other participants thought) to define certain memory communications protocols, and after they had produced a spec, Rambus said but we have some patents. This lead to at least one lawsuit I

Re: OpenID 2.0 finalization progress

2007-10-19 Thread Kevin Turner
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 10:02 -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 19:13 -0700, Dick Hardt wrote: I don't see why the two processes need to be any more dependant on each other then they are already. With all due respect, why take the risk that there are intellectual

Re: OpenID 2.0 finalization progress

2007-10-19 Thread Paul C. Bryan
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 19:13 -0700, Dick Hardt wrote: I don't see why the two processes need to be any more dependant on each other then they are already. With all due respect, why take the risk that there are intellectual property issues after the specification is finalized? To use a