David, Josh, Reviving an old thread here...
On 2-Apr-07, at 5:06 PM, Johnny Bufu wrote: > After a chat with Josh, we settled our dispute by agreeing on the > following: > > On 2-Apr-07, at 2:44 PM, Josh Hoyt wrote: >> I think it would be reasonable to always use "sreg", if for no other >> reason than for clarity, but re-using the Type URI as the namespace >> alias instead of creating a new one does not imply that the alias >> must >> be "sreg" when using OpenID 2. >> >> What if I put my proposal this way: >> >> If Simple Registration is used with OpenID 1, the arguments MUST be >> prefixed with "openid.sreg." If Simple Registration is used with >> OpenID 2, the arguments MUST be in the namespace >> "http://openid.net/sreg/1.0"; > > The first bit allows a implementation of SREG1.1/OpenID2 to be > seamlessly used in "compatibility mode" with OpenID1 messages, which > (together with the last two items in the proposal) would eliminate > the conflicts I was pointing out. Can the latest draft of SREG1.1 please be updated as per above? This is causing two issues at this time: - OpenID4Java libraries (and Sxip deployments) were implemented as per above (and the according design), assuming the update to the spec would be done in the near future; JanRain libraries however still use the published "http://openid.net/ sreg/1.1" URI for SREG1.1. This leads to interop issues between the two. - In the recently publish OP comparison chart, Sxipper appears as not supporting SREG1.1 (and for good reason from the point of view of Will's scripts and published specs). Thanks, Johnny _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
