FYI - XRI Resolution 2.0 is now undergoing one more 15-day public review
after incorporation of feedback from the previous 60-day public review in
December and January. Links to both the change-marked and clean version of
the spec are in the announcement below.
=Drummond
-Original Message---
Exactly, David, that's the process I was referring to.
It should be as lightweight as possible.
I guess the main question is, is there sufficient interest in either a
bugfix release or a more significant new release to start up a mailing list
on OpenID Authentication yet?
=Drummond
> -Orig
I don't see why changes would really need to wait, if there is an
interested group of people then lets spin up a mailing list and get
participants to agree to the IP policy.
The entire goal of having "working groups" and seperate mailing lists
is to help ensure that future OpenID specs are n
Hey James,
I suppose there could be merit, but my guess is that if you want it to
happen then you'll need to organize it.
--David
On Mar 10, 2008, at 1:38 PM, "McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> Is there merit in having a third-party group such as OWASP
> (http://w
Is there merit in having a third-party group such as OWASP
(http://www.owasp.org) provide a third-party opinion that is public on
the security of OpenID? Having large entities market OpenID will help
spread the word even faster.
***
Brad,
You are correct, the OIDF is not a technical forum. Its responsibility is to
help facilitate the operation of the technical forum and the applicable IPR
policy. The issue I was pointing out was that since the new IPR policy was
adopted in December, which calls for explicit workgroups for
Drummond,
I was under the impression that the OpenID Foundation wasn't a technical
forum. Is that not true?
- Brad
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Drummond Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Noah Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Noah Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 1:43 AM
> To: Drummond Reed
> Cc: specs@openid.net
> Subject: Re: [OpenID] Problems with OpenID and TAG httpRange-14
>
> > Noah, you are in the right place (and the General list is the wrong
>
Hi All,
I am a reaerch assistant and working on the field of trusted computing
and privacy protection and currently evaluate benefits of OpenID and
TC-Infrastructures.
One thing that is unclear for me from the spec, is about the association
secret / session.
1) Is an individual session de
> Noah, you are in the right place (and the General list is the wrong place,
> which is why I have removed that cc).
Okay, thank you.
> Once those groups start, they will each have dedicated mailing lists. In the
> meantime, this is the list for discussing any spec issues. So far one OpenID
> Aut
10 matches
Mail list logo
