On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:42:45PM +1100, Manger, James H wrote: > Perhaps I will add a note to the OpenID 2.0 errata page stating > HTTP 303 See Other semantics are not currently supported so they should > be avoided when hosting OpenIDs.
Thank you for your enlightened response, a lot of that makes sense. It is my opinion however that you should consider 302, 303 and 307 redirects "in the same boat" for the purposes of making changes to the specification/errata. -- Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/> _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
