Hello,
There have been some discussion over the years about using OpenID for
non-interactive logins. Can someone kindly tell me what the status is of
this feature? In particular login from non-browser applications - is
this currently possible (e.g. using client certificate authentication)?
Hi Anders,
You might want to check out OAuth ... it was developed for just such a
situation.
- Scott
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
There have been some discussion over the years about using OpenID for
non-interactive logins. Can someone
If I'm not mistaken, OAuth requires the user to approve the
authentication request in her browser, which is an interactive action.
Joseph Holsten pointed me to Appendix A of the OAuth specification for
an example. In step A.3, The Consumer redirects Jane’s browser to the
Service Provider User
Hi,
Has anyone integrated OpenID with Acegi security for Springs? I need help on
this.
Regards,
Shweta
DISCLAIMER:
This message (including attachment if any) is confidential and may be
privileged. If you have received this message by mistake please notify the
sender by return e-mail
Anders Feder wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, OAuth requires the user to approve the
authentication request in her browser, which is an interactive action.
This is true, but this only needs to be done when obtaining an access
token, which can be used potentially forever without further
tir, 15 07 2008 kl. 21:28 -0700, skrev John Panzer:
And of course any number of extensions could be created to obtain an
access token via an alternate path, after which normal OAuth can be
used.
Sure, but isn't this equally true for OpenID?
If that is the case, I would like to ask the list if
Hi Anders,
There has been some work on this important issue, though it seems to have been
dormant for a while.
There seem to be two proposals (by Martin Atkins) using OpenID as an HTTP
authentication mechanism. It is suitable for non-browser, non-interactive use
cases.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tir, 15 07 2008 kl. 21:28 -0700, skrev John Panzer:
And of course any number of extensions could be created to obtain an
access token via an alternate path, after which normal OAuth can be
used.
Sure, but isn't this
