Can you add a clear statement to the draft charter that implementations already
using AX 1.0 will remain compatible with the output of this working group? Or
is backwards-compatibility with existing AX implementations not a goal of this
work?
-- Mike
-Origi
Can you add a clear statement to the draft charter that implementations already
using Yadis will remain compatible with the output of this working group,
since, as I understand it, XRDS-Simple is intended to be compatible with Yadis?
Or is backwards-compatibility with existing OpenID 2.0 implem
I noticed a typo. Dick's mail address is not skip.com it is d...@sxip.com.
=nat
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
> +1 but where does the "class" in the earlier post of mine fits into in the
> scope?
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Breno de Medeiros wrote:
>
>> siiigh. T
+1 but where does the "class" in the earlier post of mine fits into in the
scope?
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Breno de Medeiros wrote:
> siiigh. That is what senility feels like.
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Allen Tom wrote:
> > +1, but I don't know who this Tom Allen is.
> >
> >
siiigh. That is what senility feels like.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Allen Tom wrote:
> +1, but I don't know who this Tom Allen is.
>
> Allen
>
>
> Breno de Medeiros wrote:
>>
>> Attribute Exchange (1.0), and Simple Registration.
>> II. Initial Membership
>>
>>* Tom Allen, a...@yahoo-i
+1, but I don't know who this Tom Allen is.
Allen
Breno de Medeiros wrote:
>
> Attribute Exchange (1.0), and Simple Registration.
> II. Initial Membership
>
> * Tom Allen, a...@yahoo-inc.com. Yahoo! Inc (editor)
> * Mike Graves, mgra...@janrain.com, JanRain, Inc.
> * Dick Hardt, d...
The in person chat was very productive, and I expect to move forward
with this proposal after the holidays.
Allen
Dick Hardt wrote:
I've been busy with other things. :-)
I had an in person chat with Allen Tom, Eran and Breno about what they
were thinking of. There was some discussion on the
Here are some additional pieces of information about Qworum, which hopefully
address your comments:
1. Qworum is an open web specification
At its heart, Qworum is a web format rather than a product. We intend to
make sure that this is and remains an open format, and we welcome
constructive critici