I think so. =nat
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Breno de Medeiros <br...@google.com> wrote: > Well, Eran published a draft of the full XRD discovery standard yesterday. > That changes things, because puts discovery on much more solid ground. The > biggest remaining issue to be addressed is on trust/security/signatures but > there is already substantial progress on that front as well, and we can > probably expect a similarly mature draft within a few weeks. > > Based on these developments, should we consider a commitment to do the > OpenID discovery spec in time for 2.1? I think it is important to decide > this early on because it affects decisions about the structure of the AuthN > spec. > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Breno de Medeiros <br...@google.com>wrote: > >> Splitting the specification will also make it easier to understand the >> changes between Yadis-based and XRD-based discovery, since the authN >> part of the spec is unlikely to change as much. >> >> I am in favor of separating the two specifications and create a >> 2.0-compatible (with language clean-up) version of discovery. >> >> 2009/1/6 Nat Sakimura <sakim...@gmail.com>: >> > But I suppose it is worthwhile to make the spec clearler. >> > It can be clearer by decomposeing the notion of OP into Discovery >> Service >> > and Authentication Service than collectively calling it as "OP". That >> will >> > facilitate a better understanding of the strength and weakness of the >> > protocol as well. >> > >> > =nat >> > >> > 2009/1/6 Drummond Reed <drummond.r...@cordance.net> >> >> >> >> Agreed that it makes sense to split it out when the underlying work >> (XRD >> >> 1.0) is ready. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> =Drummond >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> >> >> From: David Recordon [mailto:drecor...@sixapart.com] >> >> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 11:24 PM >> >> To: Drummond Reed >> >> Cc: sappe...@gmail.com; 'Nat Sakimura'; 'John Bradley'; >> specs@openid.net >> >> Subject: Re: Separation of Discovery from AuthN (was Proposal to form >> >> Discovery Working Group) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'd advocate for waiting until all of the discovery work occurring in >> >> OASIS, IETF, and W3C shakes out before we make changes to how OpenID >> >> discovery works. I'd much rather make this sort of change once rather >> than >> >> twice. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --David >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jan 4, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Drummond Reed wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm just catching up on holiday mail and wanted to add another +1 to >> >> separation of Discovery from AuthN. The sooner the better… >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> =Drummond >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> >> >> From: specs-boun...@openid.net [mailto:specs-boun...@openid.net] On >> Behalf >> >> Of David Fuelling >> >> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 8:47 AM >> >> To: Nat Sakimura >> >> Cc: John Bradley; specs@openid.net >> >> Subject: Re: Proposal to form Discovery Working Group >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> 2. Separation of OP into Discovery Service and Authentication Service. >> >> In the current terminology, OP spans both Discovery Service and >> >> Authentication Service. >> >> We should be explicit about it. >> >> >> >> +1. I would like to see discovery services separated from OP services >> >> too. >> >> >> >> >> >> John Bradley wrote: >> >> > Breno, >> >> > >> >> > I agree. I recommended separating discovery into a separate doc for >> >> > 2.1. >> >> > >> >> > There didn't seem to be support for the idea at the time, perhaps >> >> > circumstances have changed and the idea will be accepted now. >> >> > >> >> > Regards >> >> > John Bradley >> >> > =jbradley >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> specs mailing list >> >> specs@openid.net >> >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> specs mailing list >> >> specs@openid.net >> >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Nat Sakimura (=nat) >> > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > specs mailing list >> > specs@openid.net >> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> --Breno >> >> +1 (650) 214-1007 desk >> +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) >> MTV-41-3 : 383-A >> PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7) >> > > > > -- > --Breno > > +1 (650) 214-1007 desk > +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) > MTV-41-3 : 383-A > PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7) > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
