about sreg.language and sreg.country

2008-02-28 Thread Enis Soztutar

Hi,

In SREG responses, v1.1-dratf1 of the standard states that :

openid.sreg.country:

   The End User's country of residence as specified by ISO3166
   http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/index.html. 
openid.sreg.language:

   End User's preferred language as specified by ISO639
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/iso639.htm.


However, ISO3166 is divided into 3 parts, and the first one is further 
divided into for example ISO3166-1-Alpha2 , ISO3166-1-Alpha3, 
ISO3166-1-Numeric3, ISO3166-1-English shortname, etc.
Moreover the languages in ISO639 can be represented 2-letter 3-letter or 
English/French names.


I am a little bit confused about which format will be used for sending 
these fields. Should we force a specific coding(alpha2/3, Numeric3, etc) 
to be used in the standard ?


Enis Söztutar
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs


Re: SREG 1.1 Request parameters

2008-02-22 Thread Enis Soztutar
Well, I have not thought about the OP to ask the user to pass the data 
to the RP leveraging required/optional fields information. Thanks for 
the clarification.



Martin Atkins wrote:

Enis Soztutar wrote:
  
As far as I understand, the distinction between sreg.required and 
sreg.optional is entirely in the responsibility of the consumer and 
there is not reason for the protocol to include this arbitrary division. 
An OP implementation will just merge the two fields and try to fill them 
as much as it can.






This distinction is made to avoid the following flow, which isn't very 
user-friendly:


  1. RP sends user to OP with a request for email address.
  2. OP asks user whether or not to send email address.
  3. User elects not to send email address.
  4. RP then says We can't let you register without an email address. 
Type one in here.
  5. User elects to supply an email address after all, but now has no 
assistance from the OP to complete this field.


By having the optional/required distinction, in step two the OP can say 
something like The RP may not allow you to log in without this 
information. This means that the user can make the decision in step 3 
with the knowledge that it probably won't succeed, or he can make the 
decision in step 5 a few steps earlier and get assistance from the OP to 
enter the email address.


It's only a very subtle distinction, but it is important so that the OP 
can explain the situation to the user at the right point in the transaction.


___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs

  
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs