Re: Re[2]: [PROPOSAL] request nonce and name

2006-10-17 Thread Grant Monroe
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2818 On 10/17/06, Johannes Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought that, too, but couldn't find a good reference. Do you have > a reference handy that explains this? > > On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:35, Grant Monroe wrote: > > > On 10/14/06, Dick Hardt <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Re[2]: [PROPOSAL] request nonce and name

2006-10-17 Thread Johannes Ernst
I thought that, too, but couldn't find a good reference. Do you have a reference handy that explains this? On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:35, Grant Monroe wrote: On 10/14/06, Dick Hardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also note that URL parameters are not secured by TLS in HTTPS. -- Dick URL parameters

Re: Re[2]: [PROPOSAL] request nonce and name

2006-10-16 Thread Grant Monroe
On 10/14/06, Dick Hardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also note that URL parameters are not secured by TLS in HTTPS. > > -- Dick URL parameters are sent with the path in the GET line of the HTTP request after the TLS handshake, so URL parameters ARE secured. -- Grant Monroe JanRain, Inc. ___

Re: Re[2]: [PROPOSAL] request nonce and name

2006-10-14 Thread Dick Hardt
Also note that URL parameters are not secured by TLS in HTTPS. -- Dick On 13-Oct-06, at 3:57 AM, Chris Drake wrote: > Hi All, > > Just so everyone remembers: "GET" encoded "http://"; URLs usually > appear en-mass in public lists (from proxy cache logs). If you don't > want to "POST" data anypl

Re[2]: [PROPOSAL] request nonce and name

2006-10-13 Thread Chris Drake
Hi All, Just so everyone remembers: "GET" encoded "http://"; URLs usually appear en-mass in public lists (from proxy cache logs). If you don't want to "POST" data anyplace, remember to expect "replay attacks" often. Kind Regards, Chris Drake Friday, October 13, 2006, 7:48:31 PM, you wrote: