Re: Attribute Exchange 1.0 svn revision 295 review

2007-04-06 Thread Josh Hoyt
On 4/6/07, Dick Hardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agreed with you previously that the response being able to work either way if the request can. Sorry if that was not clear. Great. That will simplify the code. Given this change, is there still the need to have the special case for sending an

Re: Attribute Exchange 1.0 svn revision 295 review

2007-04-05 Thread Dick Hardt
On 4-Apr-07, at 2:07 PM, Josh Hoyt wrote: Is editing of this spec by authors of other OpenID specifications welcome? (I hope that by this review and my past spec work I'm showing that I have adequate understanding and appropriate goals.) Yes! Great feedback below Update URL issues

Re: Attribute Exchange 1.0 svn revision 295 review

2007-04-05 Thread Josh Hoyt
On Apr 5, 2007 at 8:41 AM, Dick Hardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is no way to say I want as many of X as you have, and I don't care how many that is Good point. Perhaps have a magic value like -1 to indicate as many as the user will release? I had thought the RP would likely have a