Hi David, I've had another look at the 1.1 spec, tweaked the schema, and incorporated some feedback I received from the SemWeb IG (SWIG). The new schema also includes "identifier" which - although just a single property - allows RDFers to easily connect OpenID with the rest of the RDF world. The latter has been discussed quite a bit recently, esp. the FOAF folks are looking forward to a FOAF2OpenID connector.
I *think* the schema is ready to go now, it would be really great to have it served from openid.net. I'll send a schema draft for openid2 in a separate mail. Anything else I can do? Cheers, Ben On 30.01.2007 11:56:41, Recordon, David wrote: >I'm not an RDF/OWL expert, though that looks reasonable to me. How do >we deal with Auth 1.x which uses openid.server and openid.delegate >versus Auth 2.0 which uses openid2.provider and openid2.local_id? > >--David > >-----Original Message----- >From: Benjamin Nowack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 10:13 AM >To: Recordon, David; Scott Kveton; specs@openid.net >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Tiny RDF Schema at openid.net? > >On 29.01.2007 07:53:15, Recordon, David wrote: >>I'd be happy to do it; I think we were talking about using >>xmlns.openid.net/foo as a format. >Awesome :) > >>I think the next step would be sending a copy of the RDF file for >>people here to look over. :) > >I've attached a draft which contains already some nice2haves (e.g. >the OWL and isDefinedBy bits which may be helpful but are not strictly >necessary), I'm not 100% sure about the prose, and I guess DanC will >have a comment or two as well. > >(The resource/about/ID attributes work similar to HTML's href/id, they >use the doc's URL as base, i.e. if the file was published at ><http://xmlns.openid.net/auth>, the full term URIs would be ><http://xmlns.openid.net/auth#server> etc.) > >[[[ ><?xml version="1.0"?> ><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" > xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"> > > <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> > <rdfs:label>OpenID Authentication Schema</rdfs:label> > <owl:versionInfo>2007-01-29</owl:versionInfo> > <rdfs:comment> > A basic schema for core OpenID authentication terms. > </rdfs:comment> > </owl:Ontology> > > <rdf:Property rdf:ID="server"> > <rdf:type >rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty"/> > <rdfs:label>server</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:comment> > The OpenID Identity Provider to be used for authentication. > </rdfs:comment> > <rdfs:isDefinedBy >rdf:resource="http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-1_1.html" /> > </rdf:Property> > > <rdf:Property rdf:ID="delegate"> > <rdf:type >rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty"/> > <rdfs:label>delegate</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:comment> > The delegated OpenID Identifier to be used for authentication. > </rdfs:comment> > <rdfs:isDefinedBy >rdf:resource="http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-1_1.html" /> > </rdf:Property> > ></rdf:RDF> >]]] > >Best, >Ben > > >> >>Thanks, >>--David >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>Behalf Of Scott Kveton >>Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:42 AM >>To: Benjamin Nowack; specs@openid.net >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: Tiny RDF Schema at openid.net? >> >>With just a quick look at this, it seems like a good idea. I'd like to > >>see it happen somehow. >> >>Anybody see any problems with doing this? >> >>- Scott >> >> >> >> >> >>On 1/29/07 2:13 AM, "Benjamin Nowack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering if you guys could be persuaded to host a little RDF >>> Schema file on the openid.net site. As far as I can tell, there is >>> great support for OpenID among SemWeb folks as it can be combined >>> with >> >>> things like FOAF for all sorts of cool applications. >>> >>> People recently started to write RDF extractors for the OpenID hooks >>> embedded in HTML (openid.server/delegate). As these hooks are in line > >>> with the Dublin Core guidelines [1], there are even multiple ways to >>> do this. The only thing we're missing for more widespread use is an >>> agreed-on namespace URI for the core openID terms ("server" and >>> "delegate"). And ideally this would be an openid.net one. So here is >>> my request: any chance we could put a little RDF Schema file on the >>> openid server? We would of course provide the file (it'd be just 5-10 > >>> lines of XML), and the actual URL/path doesn't really matter. An >>> alternative could be to host it in some other stable URI space, Dan >>> Connolly (CC'd) might be able to provide one at w3.org, not sure. It >>> would be cool to get your blessing either way, though. >>> >>> >>> Cheers in advance for perhaps considering it, Ben >>> >>> -- >>> Benjamin Nowack >>> >>> Kruppstr. 100 >>> 45145 Essen, Germany >>> http://www.bnode.org/ >>> >>> >>> [1] http://www.dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> specs mailing list >>> specs@openid.net >>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>specs mailing list >>specs@openid.net >>http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs >> >> > >
openid11_2007_03_01.rdfs
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs