Re: [OpenID] experimental namespace for openid.net

No doubt, proof of concepts help advance the ball in ways that are hard todo with out working code, and often working code helps you get a more streamlined spec. nothing speaks like working code. rfc822 called out the "x-" for headers for uses other than formal extensions, which gave proof-of-con

Re: [OpenID] experimental namespace for openid.net

> From: general-boun...@openid.net [general-boun...@openid.net] On Behalf Of > Dirk Balfanz [balf...@google.com] > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:10 AM > To: Breno de Medeiros > Cc: OpenID Specs Mailing List; gene...@openid.net List > Subject: Re: [OpenID] experimental name

Re: [OpenID] experimental namespace for openid.net

Hi guys, somehow I only get sporadic messages from this mailing list (I'll have to dig through my spam settings, etc, to find out what's going on there), so I read the various responses on the web archives. Let me try to respond to them: - XMLDSIG vs. other kinds of signatures: This is exactly the

Re: [OpenID] experimental namespace for openid.net

A charter proposal for the WG already exists. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:49 PM, David Recordon wrote: > Should this experimental namespace only apply to work being done by OpenID > working groups?  I'm very supportive of pushing the standards forward via > prototypes, but that should be done as par

Re: experimental namespace for openid.net

Should this experimental namespace only apply to work being done by OpenID working groups? I'm very supportive of pushing the standards forward via prototypes, but that should be done as part of the OpenID community instead of by a single company. I'd be very happy to help get a discovery

Re: experimental namespace for openid.net

+1 to http://experimental.openid.net It would be good to add this to the "repository" work Breno and John are doing as having a registry for experimental URIs would be good as well. Thanks, George Dirk Balfanz wrote: [+gene...@openid.net for a broader audience] O

Re: experimental namespace for openid.net

[+gene...@openid.net for a broader audience] On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dirk Balfanz wrote: > Hi guys, > Google would like to launch a feature in which we're allowing our Google > Apps hosted domains to become OpenID providers. The authentication part of > it is pretty simple - Google is al

Re: experimental namespace for openid.net

penid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs > > - Santosh Rajan http://santrajan.blogspot.com http://santrajan.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/experimental-namespace-for-openid.net-tp24419697p24430201.html Sent from the OpenID - Specs mailing list archive at

Re: experimental namespace for openid.net

Why dont you implement proof of concept for XRD instead? We can then formalize it. Why should we wait for XRI TC? After 11 years XRI TC cant even sign an XML document reliably. A proof-of-concept is useful for showing that something is *possible*, but if you try to formalize from there it's mo

Re: experimental namespace for openid.net

gt; https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/user-xrds?uri={%uri} > > hosted-id.google.com > > > > > > What do you guys think? > > Dirk. > > ___ > specs mailing list > specs@openid.net > http://openid.net/mailman/listi

experimental namespace for openid.net

Hi guys, Google would like to launch a feature in which we're allowing our Google Apps hosted domains to become OpenID providers. The authentication part of it is pretty simple - Google is already logging in users to their apps, so we can also host an OP endpoint for those domains and send assertio