RE: [PROPOSAL] authentication age

2006-10-02 Thread Kevin Turner
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 13:08 -0700, Recordon, David wrote: It could be augmented to also contain a response parameter telling the RP if the IdP acknowledged it, then the RP could make the decision if it wants to proceed. You will want that response parameter. Otherwise, couldn't I (as the

Re: Wrapping Up Proposals

2006-10-02 Thread larry drebes
+1 to fully vetting existing proposals and wrapping up this week. I don't think anyone is -1 on removing SIGNALL. larry- Recordon, David wrote: Since it is now October, I'm looking to have us quickly wrap up the proposals on the table and not add any additional (unless of course things come

RE: Wrapping Up Proposals

2006-10-02 Thread Recordon, David
Yeah, my mis-type on the SIGNALL. --David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of larry drebes Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:57 PM To: specs@openid.net Subject: Re: Wrapping Up Proposals +1 to fully vetting existing proposals and wrapping up

Re: What is delegation for? (was Re: Wrapping Up Proposals)

2006-10-02 Thread Josh Hoyt
On 10/2/06, Johannes Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears to me that OpenID should be able to do the same thing that we've been doing in LID: one-way nonces. This is the way that it's currently written up in the spec. When I wrote it up I had LID nonces in mind. The current proposal is to

Re: One last plea: fix problem with delegate terminology

2006-10-02 Thread Josh Hoyt
On 10/2/06, Drummond Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) In OpenID Authentication 2.0, define a new term to uniformly describe the concept of equivalent OpenID identifiers, i.e., identifiers that are both controlled by the same real-world authority (end user), and are mapped together to give the