I think we should be open (pun intended) to making changes.
I really like the OpenID Provider - shortens to OP, and is very
specific on what it does.
I have always found IdP to be a misnomer, and have mentioned it in
Now we have a great candidate, that provides more clarity, and it
The example in section 4.1.3 does not match.
error:This is an example message
Should it be openid.mode:error? (Ouch!)
I think = instead of : is better.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On 16-Oct-06, at 12:24 PM, Martin Atkins wrote:
Chris Drake wrote:
There seem to be a lot of people on this list who want to hate and
loathe the IdP, and grant all power to the RP. I do not understand
this reasoning: our users will select the IdP they trust and like,
then they will be
On 13-Oct-06, at 3:43 PM, Josh Hoyt wrote:
On 10/13/06, Marius Scurtescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IdP is issuing a signed assertion about these identifiers, I
would assume the IdP to check the link between these identifiers.
Sending two identifiers does not *prevent* the IdP from
On 16-Oct-06, at 11:21 AM, Josh Hoyt wrote:
* Bare Request
- Proposed, no discussion yet.
Sorry, I don't know what YAGNI means ...
specs mailing list
On 15-Oct-06, at 7:25 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
The rush is that 2.0 has been in a drafting phase for almost six
now, with draft five being posted at the end of June. While we
certainly can continue taking the time to make everyone happy, we
ultimately will never have
Drummond Reed wrote:
I think you may have me mistaken for somebody else on the list (. . .)
Double-blind anonymity in action? ;)
specs mailing list
On 10/17/06, Dick Hardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Authentication Age
- Re-proposed today adding clarity in motivation, general
needed to add to specification.
There is no reason for this to be in the core. I could make more
arguments about it, but I'll
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 13:29 +1000, Chris Drake wrote:
Now - how comfortable are you with
the idea of letting 1.5 billion Chinese people use OpenID
Ideally we'd have the input of the SocialBrain Foundation on that.
Those are the folks who put together OpenID.cn. Has anyone on this list
I don't see there being general consensus.
I think Chris Drake was supportive of there being less disclosure as
Josh said it could be any of the three, but preferred two parameters.
Brad did not really care.
I do care and would like to see direct criticism on the explanation I
Mail list logo