Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-11 Thread Brett McDowell
@openid.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: OpenID IPR Policy Draft Brett- We need to get consensus on what the community wants before we take this to an attorney.. However, I've done these sorts of IPR policies for standards efforts several times and I can tell you that the process

Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-07 Thread Brett McDowell
This is normally lawyer work. I recommend the companies individuals invested in OpenID immediately turn this exercise over to your legal counsel to ensure your interests--and the interests of the community--are protected appropriately. Does the new OpenID organization have legal counsel

Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-07 Thread Recordon, David
To: Recordon, David Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; specs@openid.net Subject:Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft This is normally lawyer work. I recommend the companies individuals invested in OpenID immediately turn this exercise over to your legal counsel to ensure your interests--and the interests

RE: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-07 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:01 PM To: 'Brett McDowell'; Recordon, David Cc: specs@openid.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OpenID IPR Policy Draft Brett- We need to get consensus on what the community wants before we

Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-07 Thread Martin Atkins
Recordon, David wrote: http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/IPR_Policy Is it really possible to use mailing list subscription as a trigger for a contract like this? The whole idea scares me a little bit, to be honest. It seems more sensible to me to put these restrictions on actual

Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-07 Thread Johannes Ernst
I agree. There is also the scenario where somebody does have undisclosed patents (read: at least all large companies), they consider themselves to be fine because they don't think any of the current OpenID discussion relates to them, but then, somebody takes the conversation into a

Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-07 Thread Johannes Ernst
I agree. There is also the scenario where somebody does have undisclosed patents (read: at least all large companies), they consider themselves to be fine because they don't think any of the current OpenID discussion relates to them, but then, somebody takes the conversation into a

RE: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-07 Thread Gabe Wachob
McDowell; Recordon, David Cc: specs@openid.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OpenID IPR Policy Draft Why not just take the W3C IPR policy verbatim and change the organization name? The W3C patent policy is I believe released under creative commons for precisely this reason if not this can

RE: OpenID IPR Policy Draft

2006-12-07 Thread Gabe Wachob
the work to a more formal standards body. -Gabe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Atkins Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; specs@openid.net Subject: Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft Recordon