Re: No New DB Field Requirement? (WAS: RE: Questions about IIW Identifier Recycling Table)

2007-06-08 Thread Dick Hardt
It is more complex having to use two fields to uniquely identify a user in a DB then one. DB queries are more complex and there is more opportunity for the developer to make mistakes. Given a goal of OpenID is to be simple, one field is better then two. -- Dick On 8-Jun-07, at 10:14 AM, John

RE: No New DB Field Requirement? (WAS: RE: Questions about IIW Identifier Recycling Table)

2007-06-08 Thread Recordon, David
w DB Field Requirement? (WAS: RE: Questions about IIW Identifier Recycling Table) On 8-Jun-07, at 10:02 AM, Recordon, David wrote: > I'm confused as to why a RP having to not create a new DB field is a > requirement when looking to solve this problem. RP's implementations > alre

Re: No New DB Field Requirement? (WAS: RE: Questions about IIW Identifier Recycling Table)

2007-06-08 Thread Johnny Bufu
On 8-Jun-07, at 10:02 AM, Recordon, David wrote: > I'm confused as to why a RP having to not create a new DB field is a > requirement when looking to solve this problem. RP's implementations > already need to change to upgrade from 1.1 to 2.0 and this has never > been a requirement in the past.