On 16-Oct-06, at 2:44 PM, Josh Hoyt wrote:
On 10/16/06, Recordon, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6.1 Signed List Algorithm
[...]
I'm thinking it would make sense to
change this algorithm to first alphabetically sort the arguments
to make
it very clear in terms of ordering.
I think it's
On 10/16/06, Marius Scurtescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorting of unicode strings while not terrible hard it is not trivial
either. Why bother? The list of signed fields gives an explicit
ordering, this is good enough IMO.
Sorting by UTF-8-encoded octet sequence is easy.
Why would be an
Marius Scurtescu wrote:
On 16-Oct-06, at 2:44 PM, Josh Hoyt wrote:
On 10/16/06, Recordon, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6.1 Signed List Algorithm
[...]
I'm thinking it would make sense to
change this algorithm to first alphabetically sort the arguments
to make
it very clear in terms of
On 16-Oct-06, at 3:13 PM, Josh Hoyt wrote:
On 10/16/06, Marius Scurtescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorting of unicode strings while not terrible hard it is not trivial
either. Why bother? The list of signed fields gives an explicit
ordering, this is good enough IMO.
Sorting by UTF-8-encoded
On 10/16/06, Marius Scurtescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just so that there is an obvious one way to do it, so that it's easier
to get right, if I understand David's motivation. It's also easier to
make clear in the spec.
If ordering is not important then you are guaranteed to get it right.
