RE: Re[2]: Strong Authencation (was [PROPOSAL] authentication age

2006-10-06 Thread Drummond Reed
2006 2:26 PM > To: 'Chris Drake' > Cc: specs@openid.net > Subject: RE: Re[2]: Strong Authencation (was [PROPOSAL] > authentication age > > Chris, > > Great examples. Signed credentials makes lots of sense. > OpenID AuthN 2.0 doesn't handle

RE: Re[2]: Strong Authencation (was [PROPOSAL] authentication age

2006-10-06 Thread Granqvist, Hans
#x27;Chris Drake' > Cc: specs@openid.net > Subject: RE: Re[2]: Strong Authencation (was [PROPOSAL] > authentication age > > Chris, > > Great examples. Signed credentials makes lots of sense. > OpenID AuthN 2.0 doesn't handle them yet but I can completely &g

RE: Re[2]: Strong Authencation (was [PROPOSAL] authentication age

2006-10-05 Thread Drummond Reed
mmond Reed Cc: specs@openid.net Subject: Re[2]: Strong Authencation (was [PROPOSAL] authentication age Hi Drummond, Example1: RSA would provide a signed response indicating that the user correctly entered the SecurID token code. Example2: The RP would have the public key of the company that sup

Re[2]: Strong Authencation (was [PROPOSAL] authentication age

2006-10-05 Thread Chris Drake
Hi Drummond, Example1: RSA would provide a signed response indicating that the user correctly entered the SecurID token code. Example2: The RP would have the public key of the company that supplies the fingerprint scanning hardware (although some extra thought as to how a fingerprint ultimately m