On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org
, but IANAL.
-Brett
cheers
Antoine.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:16:34 -0400
Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:45:27 -0400
Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
Should we add the MIT license to our benchmarks repo as well
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Quick question about the hexiom2 benchmark: what does it measure? It is
by
far the slowest benchmark I ported, and considering it isn't a real
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Brett Cannon br
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
The hexiom benchmark is very slow. Is there a reason it's included
there?
Already been asked and answered:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/speed/2012-September/000209.html
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Miquel Torres tob...@gmail.com wrote:
Right. On the webapp (Codespeed) side of things I am willing to help
in anything you need.
The blocker has been mostly the benchmark runner, AFAIK.
And how specifically is that a blocker so we can work on eliminating
With the planned move to GitHub, there is an opportunity to try and rework
the set of benchmarks -- and anything else -- in 2016 by starting a new
benchmark repo from scratch. E.g., modern numeric benchmarks, long-running
benchmarks that warm up JITs, using pip with pegged bugfix versions so we
ues or on the speed@python.org
> mailing list.
>
> Many thanks to Intel for funding the work to get it set up and to
> Brett Cannon and Benjamin Peterson for their reviews.
>
> Happy benchmarking,
> --
> Zach
> ___
> Python-Dev ma
I just wanted to quickly say, Victor, this all sounds great!
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 at 07:17 Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I modified the CPython benchmark suite to use my perf module:
> https://hg.python.org/sandbox/benchmarks_perf
>
>
> Changes:
>
> * use
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 at 10:25 Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated all benchmarks of the CPython Benchmark Suite to use my perf
> module. So you get timings of all individual run all *all* benchmarks
> and store them in JSON to analyze them in detail. Each benchmark
Have you reported this to the performance issue tracker, Peter?
https://github.com/python/performance
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 at 02:31 Peter Cawley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to run pyperformance (https://github.com/python/performance)
> for exploring Python 3.6 x64 speed on
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 at 03:58 Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to run a new instance of CodeSpeed (the website
> behing speed.python.org) which would run the "performance" benchmark
> suite rather than the "benchmarks" benchmark suite? And would it be
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 at 15:08 Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the first release of the "new" benchmark suite, I chose the name
> "performance", since "benchmark" and "benchmarks" names were already
> reserved on PyPI. It's the name of the Python module, but also of
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 at 17:54 Victor Stinner
wrote:
> 2017-03-16 1:38 GMT+01:00 Wang, Peter Xihong >:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am attaching an image with comparison running the CALL_METHOD in the
> old Grand Unified Python Benchmark (GUPB)
On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 at 09:50 Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 16:28:29 +0000
> Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > My experience is that:
> > > - you want lazy imports to be implicit, i.e. they sho
ython.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Send Speed mailing list submissions to
>>>> speed@python.org
>>>>
>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed
>>>&
ect line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Speed digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>1. Re: Lazy-loading to decrease python_startup time (Brett Cannon)
>>2. Re: Lazy-loading to decrease python_startup time (An
I thought Piston had been shuttered by Dropbox, so I wouldn't worry about
convincing them to change speed.pyston.org.
On Mon, May 29, 2017, 13:57 Victor Stinner,
wrote:
> 2017-05-29 22:45 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou :
> > I don't know. It means that
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 at 07:37 Matti Picus wrote:
> On 20/03/18 17:31, Matti Picus wrote:
> > On 14/02/18 20:18, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >> On 14 February 2018 at 07:52, Mark Shannon wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 13/02/18 14:27, Matti Picus wrote:
> I
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:39 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just renamed my "perf" module to "pyperf" to avoid confusion with
> the Linux perf tool which provides a Python binding using "perf" name
> as well.
>
> For the Python benchmark suite https://github.com/python/performance/
> I
22 matches
Mail list logo