[speedtouch] Re: speedtouch 330 - a lot of "usb_submit_urb returned -22" messages

2007-01-03 Thread Duncan Sands
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:45:24AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > > > > > e) various other cases > > > > This is us. I hope to look into this further tonight. Well, the only potentially relevant test I could find in the uhci hcd is that it returns -EINVAL if the USB device is l

[speedtouch] Re: gyp from kernel > 2.6.17.8

2007-01-03 Thread Duncan Sands
Hi Steve, > > There's an experimental feature which only works with speedtouch 330s or > > better: download using isochronous urbs, rather than bulk urbs. This > > should improve performance on high speed connections. You can turn it > > on with enable_isoc=1. It may be worth turning on, becau

[speedtouch] Re: packet loss with kernel 2.6.17.8

2007-01-03 Thread Duncan Sands
> Well, here are the results... > Dec 31 16:21:31 pfw kernel: ATM dev 0: usbatm_extract_one_cell: unknown > vpi/vci (0/3656)! > Dec 31 16:44:42 pfw kernel: ATM dev 0: usbatm_extract_one_cell: unknown > vpi/vci (92/7393)! > Dec 31 18:57:27 pfw kernel: ATM dev 0: usbatm_extract_one_cell: unknown

[speedtouch] Re: gyp from kernel > 2.6.17.8

2007-01-03 Thread Duncan Sands
> Yes, once MODULE_UNLOAD is set MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD is on via the > default configuration options in 2.6.19.1. That said, looking back through > my cvs it seems that I on earlier versions I had explicitly set it (although > why I don't know). > > Should I try unsetting it? Please do. I'm not s