[speedtouch] Re: [RFC] 330 rev4 support

2004-02-15 Thread Edouard Gomez
Gilles Espinasse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: the bootblock + main firmware discusion Well, the change doesn't make it very different from old versions. Users are just required to find another file, and specify it on the command line. I know it's already troublesome to obtain the

[speedtouch] Re: [RFC] 330 rev4 support

2004-02-15 Thread Martin Galpin
On Sunday 15 February 2004 12:50 am, Edouard Gomez wrote: On  my  side,  i've   already  completed  the  new  firmware  extraction code/API. For  legal reasons i'm  going to remove the  proprietary data1 source. I'm also going to provide  the free version in a standalone file that   will  

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-15 Thread Edouard Gomez
John Hysted ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: patch I commited the changes i was talking about this week. Do you plan to update your patch to the new CVS or may i pick what i consider suitable from it myself ? If you volunteer, then i have a request: - don't put any boot code (data1) inside

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Edouard, I commited the changes i was talking about this week. Do you plan to update your patch to the new CVS or may i pick what i consider suitable from it myself ? I'll probably do this on my side this afternoon or this evening. I keep you informed. PS: the below changes

[speedtouch] Re: Rev 4 330 Problems

2004-02-15 Thread kehanharman
Don't worry about this. I used the configuration scripts in the tarball, and I am now thundering through the web, so it was obviously some problem with my hand editing of the files. Thanks everybody for your hard work, Kehan -- Kehan Tristam Harman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-15 Thread Edouard Gomez
John Hysted ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Pick whatever you consider suitable from my patch. I was going to try and incorporate your changes this evening, but now my changes are much smaller than yours. All I need is that for Rev modems the code which in version 1.2 said if

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-15 Thread Gilles Espinasse
- Original Message - From: John Hysted [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 5:59 PM Subject: [speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch snip Smoothwall and IPCOP will have a problem with the extra -a parameter and will probably

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-15 Thread John Hysted
Yes the use of globals in pusb was a hack, but I couldn't see any way to get from fdusb to the Rev of the modem. For kernel mode and Rev 0400 I had implemented a timeout and loop, but had problems with extra messages like 06:33:44 kernel: usb_control/bulk_msg timeout 06:33:44 kernel: usbdevfs