Re: [sphinx-dev] Sorted Glossary with german umlauts

2010-12-17 Thread Kevin Dunn
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:35, Jan Ulrich Hasecke wrote: > > Am 17.12.2010 um 21:20 schrieb Kevin Dunn: > >> Add an extra ``-g`` flag: makeindex -s -g python.ist '$(basename >> $<).idx' which will then use German ordering.  If you are on a *nix >> platform, type ``man makeindex`` to see the detail

Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: unimpressed with latex output

2010-12-17 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 17/12/10 Guenter Milde said: > Yes. At least, this limitation should be documented. Ideally the parser should halt before passing it to latex. > > Sounds like Sphinx needs to catch up to docutils then. > > Volunteers welcome. I wish I had the time to fix the world's code. Sadly I find I mus

Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: unimpressed with latex output

2010-12-17 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 17/12/10 Guenter Milde said: > I can understand your frustration. However, this error message alone does > not help to locate the error. To find the core of the problem we need a > minimal example. I'll try to come up with another one. > You could consider the rst2pdf extension that uses repo

Re: [sphinx-dev] Sorted Glossary with german umlauts

2010-12-17 Thread Jan Ulrich Hasecke
Am 17.12.2010 um 21:20 schrieb Kevin Dunn: > Add an extra ``-g`` flag: makeindex -s -g python.ist '$(basename > $<).idx' which will then use German ordering. If you are on a *nix > platform, type ``man makeindex`` to see the details. Mh, but how to call latex using the makefile? Perhaps the -g

Re: [sphinx-dev] Sorted Glossary with german umlauts

2010-12-17 Thread Kevin Dunn
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:56, Jan Ulrich Hasecke wrote: > Hi, > > I have a sorted glossary with: > > .. glossary:: >   :sorted: > > But the german umlauts äöü are not sorted after a, o and u as I would expect > it, but after  z. Is there a way to configure this? > > The same issuse arises in the

[sphinx-dev] Re: unimpressed with latex output

2010-12-17 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-12-17, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 17/12/10 Guenter Milde said: >> It looks like you cannot use itemize in tabulary -> check the tabulary >> documentation. > But rst permits it, so it's a bug that sphinx is generating this output. Yes. At least, this limitation should be documented.

[sphinx-dev] Re: unimpressed with latex output

2010-12-17 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-12-17, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > I removed anything nested in my tables, embedded block quotes > broke the document too, and now I get this > >) > ! Incomplete \iffalse; all text was ignored after line 617. >=20 > \fi=20 ><*> mbg_engguide_6.1.tex >

Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: unimpressed with latex output

2010-12-17 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 17/12/10 Michael P. Soulier said: > > It looks like you cannot use itemize in tabulary -> check the tabulary > > documentation. > > But rst permits it, so it's a bug that sphinx is generating this output. I removed anything nested in my tables, embedded block quotes were broke the document to

Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: unimpressed with latex output

2010-12-17 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 17/12/10 Guenter Milde said: > It looks like you cannot use itemize in tabulary -> check the tabulary > documentation. But rst permits it, so it's a bug that sphinx is generating this output. > BTW: processing > https://bitbucket-assetroot.s3.amazonaws.com/birkenfeld/sphinx/20101210/565/useca

[sphinx-dev] Re: unimpressed with latex output

2010-12-17 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-12-16, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > --S1dYL6sY+prtcMLk > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > On 16/12/10 Guenter Milde said: >> This should be a good base for a minimal example: try to remove as much >> as possible from the document so that the resul