Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: cpp domain: How to express subscripted variables

2011-01-07 Thread Armin Ronacher
Hi, On 1/3/11 12:31 PM, Akira Kitada wrote: Workaround is to use c:member instead of cpp:member .. c:member:: int[10] Spam.hams I will implement that for the C++ domain. I did not think about Arrays being public API interfaces. Regards, Armin -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sphinx-dev] References in cpp domain

2010-05-30 Thread Armin Ronacher
Hi, On 5/26/10 12:50 AM, Dmitriy wrote: I'm trying to refer to a member function defined within a C++ class (using the cpp domain) without much success. I can refer to the class no problem, but the member functions don't seem to work. Update to the latest development version. That was a bug.

Re: Summer of Code

2009-03-19 Thread Armin Ronacher
Hi, Georg Brandl schrieb: I would be the primary mentor, and I hope Armin will act as my backup; I'll try to contact him ASAP. Do you need more info? Count me in. Regards, Armin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Unifying staticmethod and classmethod

2009-02-05 Thread Armin Ronacher
Hi, Another thing that would be possible is adding a configuration to autodoc so that classmethods can optionally be introspected as staticmethods. Regards, Armin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Jinja2 on Windows

2009-01-06 Thread Armin Ronacher
Hi, Yarko Tymciurak wrote: Well - I got the latest Sphinx from bitbucket, and ... sphinx stopped working on Windows. I've resolved it, and here is what I did: *snip* If you have a better way, please post (I was just tired of messing with this and wanted to get it working). Because of a

Re: Jinja2 error

2008-12-29 Thread Armin Ronacher
Hi, Kent Tenney wrote: Ubuntu 8.10 after an update I'm getting the following writing output... README Exception occurred: File /home/ktenney/work/virtualenv/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Jinja2-2.1.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/jinja2/environment.py, line 357, in parse raise e