Re: Status update

2009-05-04 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-05-03, James Rowe wrote: --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline * James Rowe (jnr...@gmail.com) wrote: I think for all intents and purposes it currently is that compatible, in my opinion `cssclass' is not something that is used

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread James Rowe
* Georg Brandl (ge...@python.org) wrote: * The docutils people have come across Sphinx' redefinition of the class directive; they don't like that very much. I'm to blame, since I didn't remember/know about docutils' class when adding these directives to Sphinx. Now we have a few

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
On May 3, 2009, at 5:54 AM, Christophe de VIENNE wrote: 2009/5/2 Georg Brandl ge...@python.org Now we have a few choices: - Keep the incompatibility. - Rename Sphinx' class. I don't have a suggestion for a better name though. I would go for this option (renaming). And I think it

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread Christophe de VIENNE
2009/5/2 Georg Brandl ge...@python.org Now we have a few choices: - Keep the incompatibility. - Rename Sphinx' class. I don't have a suggestion for a better name though. I would go for this option (renaming). And I think it is a change that is acceptable for 1.0 release. My point is

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread Werner F. Bruhin
Christophe de VIENNE wrote: 2009/5/2 Georg Brandl ge...@python.org mailto:ge...@python.org Now we have a few choices: - Keep the incompatibility. - Rename Sphinx' class. I don't have a suggestion for a better name though. I would go for this option (renaming). And

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread James Rowe
Is this going to be the Great Sphinx Bikeshedding of '09? :) * Doug Hellmann (doug.hellm...@gmail.com) wrote: On May 3, 2009, at 5:54 AM, Christophe de VIENNE wrote: 2009/5/2 Georg Brandl ge...@python.org - Rename Sphinx' class. I don't have a suggestion for a better name though.

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
On May 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, James Rowe wrote: Is this going to be the Great Sphinx Bikeshedding of '09? :) * Doug Hellmann (doug.hellm...@gmail.com) wrote: On May 3, 2009, at 5:54 AM, Christophe de VIENNE wrote: 2009/5/2 Georg Brandl ge...@python.org - Rename Sphinx' class. I don't have

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-05-03, James Rowe wrote: * Georg Brandl (ge...@python.org) wrote: * The docutils people have come across Sphinx' redefinition of the class directive; they don't like that very much. I'm to blame, since I didn't remember/know about docutils' class when adding these directives to

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread James Rowe
* Doug Hellmann (doug.hellm...@gmail.com) wrote: On May 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, James Rowe wrote: I'm not that concerned about absolute compatibility, but I would prefer sphinx to build on docutils rather than modify it. I should be able to give my tech writer the docutils version of the reST

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread James Rowe
* James Rowe (jnr...@gmail.com) wrote: I think for all intents and purposes it currently is that compatible, in my opinion `cssclass' is not something that is used very often. That should have read: I think for all intents and purposes it currently is that compatible, in my opinion

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread Max Battcher
On 5/3/2009 9:03, James Rowe wrote: +1 on warning in the next point release and generating an error in 1.0. I like that too, as I said in my other mail the idea of long-lived alias seems like a bad idea in my eyes. My point is that having an incompatibility with docutils will always

Re: Status update

2009-05-03 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georg Brandl wrote: since Sphinx is already widely used and in production use I have been wondering if it would be easier (and shorter) to list the projects that *do not* use Sphinx :-) Roger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9

Status update [part 2]

2009-05-02 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl schrieb: And one item I'd like to have your input about: Hah, I forgot the two others! * Since 0.6 now has good theme support and the ability of packaging up a theme nicely, I'd love to include new exciting themes created by YOU. So please don't hesitate to drown me in links

Re: Status update [part 2]

2009-05-02 Thread Wei-Wei Guo
Georg Brandl 写道: Hi, * At one point, we had a dedicated repository for third-party extensions; I'd like to know if you think something like that would be useful: A repository on bitbucket sphinx-contrib where I give out access to anyone who wants to publish his/her extension that is

Re: Status update

2009-05-02 Thread Wei-Wei Guo
Georg Brandl 写道: Hi, * The docutils people have come across Sphinx' redefinition of the class directive; they don't like that very much. I'm to blame, since I didn't remember/know about docutils' class when adding these directives to Sphinx. Now we have a few choices: - Keep