[sphinx-users] Re: Why do my PDF footnotes start with number 43?

2018-03-26 Thread 'Erin Kelly' via sphinx-users
Thank you, Jean-François! I created https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/4784 for this issue. The workaround is working well for me. (I actually slightly prefer having the footnote numbering restart at each chapter.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[sphinx-users] Re: Why do my PDF footnotes start with number 43?

2018-03-23 Thread jfbu
Hi, Le 22/03/2018 à 23:13, 'Erin Kelly' via sphinx-users a écrit : I was able to recreate this in an example project. It seems that all I need is to have a rst_prolog substitution with a URL, and set the LaTeX output to format those as footnotes. This example shows a numbering gap before the

[sphinx-users] Re: Why do my PDF footnotes start with number 43?

2018-03-22 Thread jfbu
Le 22/03/2018 à 11:27, jfbu a écrit : Le 22/03/2018 à 10:43, jfbu a écrit : Le 28/02/2018 à 18:33, 'Erin Kelly' via sphinx-users a écrit : I have a document with intersphinx cross-references. I just switched from inline URL references to footnote URL references for PDF. Everything works

[sphinx-users] Re: Why do my PDF footnotes start with number 43?

2018-03-22 Thread jfbu
Le 22/03/2018 à 10:43, jfbu a écrit : Le 28/02/2018 à 18:33, 'Erin Kelly' via sphinx-users a écrit : I have a document with intersphinx cross-references. I just switched from inline URL references to footnote URL references for PDF. Everything works fine, but for some reason the first

[sphinx-users] Re: Why do my PDF footnotes start with number 43?

2018-03-22 Thread jfbu
Le 28/02/2018 à 18:33, 'Erin Kelly' via sphinx-users a écrit : I have a document with intersphinx cross-references. I just switched from inline URL references to footnote URL references for PDF. Everything works fine, but for some reason the first footnote is number 43! The numbering