On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 07:22:53PM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
> +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rspi_dma_prep_sg(struct scatterlist
> *sg,
> + void *buf, unsigned len, struct dma_chan *chan,
> + enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:14:49AM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
> 2012/01/26 19:22, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:43:57PM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
> [ snip ]
> >> static void spi_sh_set_bit(struct spi_sh_data *ss, unsigned long val,
> >&g
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:43:57PM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
> This SPI controller's access size is 32, or 8-bit. The previous driver
> supported 32-bit only. So, this patch adds IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK
> decoding, an then, the driver can handle the SPI controller of 8-bit.
> This patch als
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:13:31PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Use the sh_dma dmaengine driver to support DMA on MSIOF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
No real opinion one way or the other, just a couple observations.
> +static void sh_msiof_request_dma(struct sh_msiof_spi_pr
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Surely this is a bug in diff. Or perhaps put more politely,
> > diff isn't smart enough to realise a) this is C and b) xxx: isn't
> > a valid function name in C.
>
> Oh, perha
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:27:43AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:56:47PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > NULL + != NULL, but reading from that address
> > is usually not a very good idea and often leads to problems, like kernel
> > Oopses in this case, easily rep
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:31:18AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:17:49AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> Hold the phone; please coordinate with me before picking up SPI
> >> patches into yo
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:17:49AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > Please pull from:
> >
> > ? ? ? ?master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git
> > sh/for-2.6.33
> >
> > Which contains
too. In any event, the current code is broken for
at least: arm, avr32, blackfin, microblaze, mn10300, and sh.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt
---
drivers/spi/xilinx_spi.c | 28
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/xilinx_spi.c
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:05:45PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> This patch adds MSIOF and mmc_spi platform data for
> the CN11 port on the SuperH Ecovec24 board. No card
> detect interrupt is available so the MMC code is
> configured to poll. The WP signal is implemented
> together with CD and power
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:11:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:55:31 +0900
> Magnus Damm wrote:
> > +struct sh_msiof_spi_priv {
> > + struct spi_bitbang bitbang; /* must be first for spi_bitbang.c */
>
> Well if that's the case then spi_bitbang.c needs smacking. What c
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:57:02AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:52:47AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > > Here is a very simple driver for the HSPI block on many SuperH processors.
> > &
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:52:47AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > Here is a very simple driver for the HSPI block on many SuperH processors.
> > I could only subject it to limited testings, as my sole SPI device here is
&
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> Here is a very simple driver for the HSPI block on many SuperH processors.
> I could only subject it to limited testings, as my sole SPI device here is
> a write-only 8bit digital poti. It seems to do the right thing as far as
> I cou
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> +out2:
> + release_resource(priv->ioarea);
> + kfree(priv->ioarea);
What is this kfree() for?
> +static int __devexit hspi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct hspi_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:22:22PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2008, Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> > > > +#define spidelay(x) ndelay(x)
> > > > +
> > > > +#defineEXPAND_BITBANG_TXRX
> > > > +#include
> > >
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:29:29PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2008, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > +struct sh_sci_spi {
> > + struct spi_bitbang bitbang;
> > +
> > + unsigned long mapbase;
>
> Not "void __iomem *mapbase"?
>
> I notice that you're not doing an ioremap() to get
17 matches
Mail list logo
