On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 07:22:53PM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
+static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rspi_dma_prep_sg(struct scatterlist
*sg,
+ void *buf, unsigned len, struct dma_chan *chan,
+ enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
+{
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:43:57PM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
This SPI controller's access size is 32, or 8-bit. The previous driver
supported 32-bit only. So, this patch adds IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK
decoding, an then, the driver can handle the SPI controller of 8-bit.
This patch also
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:14:49AM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
2012/01/26 19:22, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:43:57PM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
[ snip ]
static void spi_sh_set_bit(struct spi_sh_data *ss, unsigned long val,
@@ -464,6 +473,18 @@ static int
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
Surely this is a bug in diff. Or perhaps put more politely,
diff isn't smart enough to realise a) this is C and b) xxx: isn't
a valid function name in C.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:27:43AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:56:47PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
NULL + small offset != NULL, but reading from that small offset address
is usually not a very good idea and often leads to problems, like kernel
Oopses in
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:17:49AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org wrote:
Please pull from:
? ? ? ?master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git
sh/for-2.6.33
Which contains:
Magnus Damm (1):
? ? ?usb
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:11:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:55:31 +0900
Magnus Damm magnus.d...@gmail.com wrote:
+struct sh_msiof_spi_priv {
+ struct spi_bitbang bitbang; /* must be first for spi_bitbang.c */
Well if that's the case then spi_bitbang.c needs
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
Here is a very simple driver for the HSPI block on many SuperH processors.
I could only subject it to limited testings, as my sole SPI device here is
a write-only 8bit digital poti. It seems to do the right thing as far as
I could
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
+out2:
+ release_resource(priv-ioarea);
+ kfree(priv-ioarea);
What is this kfree() for?
+static int __devexit hspi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct hspi_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+
