Jassi Brar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Mark Brown
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Although the hardware supports interrupts we're not currently using
> them
> >> at all since for small transfers the overhead is greater than that for
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Mark Brown
> wrote:
>
>> Although the hardware supports interrupts we're not currently using them
>> at all since for small transfers the overhead is greater than that for
>> busy waiting and for large transf
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> Although the hardware supports interrupts we're not currently using them
> at all since for small transfers the overhead is greater than that for
> busy waiting and for large transfers we have interrupts from the DMA.
> This means that if the
Although the hardware supports interrupts we're not currently using them
at all since for small transfers the overhead is greater than that for
busy waiting and for large transfers we have interrupts from the DMA.
This means that if the hardware reports an error (especially one which
might not stal
Although the hardware supports interrupts we're not currently using them
at all since for small transfers the overhead is greater than that for
busy waiting and for large transfers we have interrupts from the DMA.
This means that if the hardware reports an error (especially one which
might not stal
