On 2020-06-14 22 h 49, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:51 AM Luca Filipozzi
> wrote:
>
>> @all: Having slept on things, I'm changing my position from (2a) to (2c)
>> since it is more appropriate to correct the lack of charging Debian 5%
>> on sponsorships than it is to correct
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:51 AM Luca Filipozzi
wrote:
> @all: Having slept on things, I'm changing my position from (2a) to (2c)
> since it is more appropriate to correct the lack of charging Debian 5%
> on sponsorships than it is to correct the actual/perceived
> miscommunication between
@all: Having slept on things, I'm changing my position from (2a) to (2c)
since it is more appropriate to correct the lack of charging Debian 5%
on sponsorships than it is to correct the actual/perceived
miscommunication between Debian and SPI.
So, for clarity:
- do not refund Debian for
I would charge 5% going forward, and make no changes (refunds or new charges)
for what happened in the past.
Bdale
On June 13, 2020 11:09:52 AM MDT, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Per other branch on this thread, Stephen outlined that the Board is
>working with the Debian Representative on
Hi,
Per other branch on this thread, Stephen outlined that the Board is
working with the Debian Representative on clarifying the status of
DebConf sponsorships, etc.
Since I'm in favour of 'fairness' and 'consistency', I agree with Peter
that some questions need answering:
(1) Historically,
Greetings,
* Holger Levsen (hol...@layer-acht.org) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:55:03PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > I dislike at least section 2 here, where we only refund Debian, but not
> > other conferences.
>
> *that* and then I'm confused why the resolution title only speaks
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:55:03PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > THE SPI BOARD RESOLVES THAT
> >
> > 1. For conferences held by SPI associated projects in 2020 where
> >SPI collects the conference sponsorship funds, SPI will waive
> >its 5% administrative fee.
> >
> > 2. SPI
Greetings,
* Daniel Vetter (daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch) wrote:
> My worry (from X.org project) is that if we drop the 5% from
> conference sponsorships (which is the biggest chunk of income for
> X.org right now), then will SPI have enough money to run solid
> services?
That's definitely a great
Hi all,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:01 AM Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon Jun 08, 2020 at 17:13:43 -0400, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
> > SPI is having a special meeting on 2020-06-22 at 20:00 UTC in #spi on
> > irc.oftc.net to vote on this proposed resolution:
> >
> > Resolution
Hello Michael, Martin, all,
I personally agree that inconsistently charging the 5% fee is unacceptable,
but
not with the proposed remedy. I would rather suggest explicitly granting
amnesty
on past omissions (assuming no technical objections such as from the
auditors),
and enforcing the 5%
Hi,
On Mon Jun 08, 2020 at 23:55:03 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Also DebConf can not say they do not know about the 5%, as it is
> well-known and documented per SPIs Projects howto:
>
> | All transaction costs (such as the fees we are charged to process credit
> | cards and wire
Hi,
On Mon Jun 08, 2020 at 17:13:43 -0400, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
> SPI is having a special meeting on 2020-06-22 at 20:00 UTC in #spi on
> irc.oftc.net to vote on this proposed resolution:
>
> Resolution 2020-06-08.mcs.1:
> 2020 Conferences and SPI 5% fee
>
> WHEREAS
>
> 1. Software in
SPI is having a special meeting on 2020-06-22 at 20:00 UTC in #spi on
irc.oftc.net to vote on this proposed resolution:
Resolution 2020-06-08.mcs.1:
2020 Conferences and SPI 5% fee
WHEREAS
1. Software in the Public Interest, Inc. (SPI) is a Debian Trusted
Organization.
2. The annual Debian
13 matches
Mail list logo
