Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

- Original Message - > On 03/01/2011 09:30 PM, william wrote: > > On 03/01/2011 07:21 PM, Alon Levy wrote: > >>> On 03/01/2011 10:00 AM, william wrote: > On 03/01/2011 08:13 AM, william wrote: > > On 03/01/2011 12:23 AM, Robert Relyea wrote: > >> On 02/28/2011 08:34 AM, willi

Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

On 03/01/2011 07:29 PM, Frédéric Grelot wrote: You've given lots of explanation about what you did and now it works! : if you have time, it may be a good idea to put that into a wiki page at http://www.spice-space.org/page/Main_Page since you already made most of the work :-) Frederic. Ok i

[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-win-qxl] spice: windows qxl drivers: support x64 build

Hi Arnon and Alon I need to compile qxl drivers for Windows 7 64 bit, Windows XP and spice client that will have Spice graphic and our Univeristy logo. I need to setup 64-bit Windows environment to build spice. Please tell me where do I start ? What tools do I need ? Which package dependency to

Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

On 03/01/2011 09:30 PM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 07:21 PM, Alon Levy wrote: On 03/01/2011 10:00 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 08:13 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 12:23 AM, Robert Relyea wrote: On 02/28/2011 08:34 AM, william wrote: On 02/26/2011 08:49 PM, Alon Levy wrote: On Fri,

Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

On 03/01/2011 07:21 PM, Alon Levy wrote: On 03/01/2011 10:00 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 08:13 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 12:23 AM, Robert Relyea wrote: On 02/28/2011 08:34 AM, william wrote: On 02/26/2011 08:49 PM, Alon Levy wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:06:33PM +0100, willia

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] x11: Use _exit rather then exit on X errors (rhbz#680763)

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 06:25:59PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > This avoids us trying to restore the original resolution when we're fullscreen > and an X error happens. As restoring fullscreen is a bad idea then as this > involves making more X calls, which can get us stuck (in side an XLockDispla

Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

You've given lots of explanation about what you did and now it works! : if you have time, it may be a good idea to put that into a wiki page at http://www.spice-space.org/page/Main_Page since you already made most of the work :-) Frederic. - Mail original - > On 03/01/2011 10:00 AM, wi

Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

> On 03/01/2011 10:00 AM, william wrote: > > On 03/01/2011 08:13 AM, william wrote: > >> On 03/01/2011 12:23 AM, Robert Relyea wrote: > >>> On 02/28/2011 08:34 AM, william wrote: > On 02/26/2011 08:49 PM, Alon Levy wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:06:33PM +0100, william wrote: > >

Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

On 03/01/2011 10:00 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 08:13 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 12:23 AM, Robert Relyea wrote: On 02/28/2011 08:34 AM, william wrote: On 02/26/2011 08:49 PM, Alon Levy wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:06:33PM +0100, william wrote: On 02/24/2011 08:10 PM, Alon Lev

Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

On 03/01/2011 10:00 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 08:13 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 12:23 AM, Robert Relyea wrote: On 02/28/2011 08:34 AM, william wrote: On 02/26/2011 08:49 PM, Alon Levy wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:06:33PM +0100, william wrote: On 02/24/2011 08:10 PM, Alon Lev

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] x11: Use _exit rather then exit on X errors (rhbz#680763)

Perhaps the client should fork and the parent process can watch for this scenario and restore the resolution safely that way? O n Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:25 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > This avoids us trying to restore the original resolution when we're fullscreen > and an X error happens. As rest

[Spice-devel] [PATCH] x11: Use _exit rather then exit on X errors (rhbz#680763)

This avoids us trying to restore the original resolution when we're fullscreen and an X error happens. As restoring fullscreen is a bad idea then as this involves making more X calls, which can get us stuck (in side an XLockDisplay call for example). --- client/x11/platform.cpp |4 ++-- 1 file

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] client: exit nicely for --controller with no SPICE_XPI_SOCKET (#644292)

Uri Lublin wrote: When starting spicec with --controller, SPICE_XPI_SOCKET environment variable must be defined so spicec and the controller can be connected. --- client/controller.cpp |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/client/controller.cpp b/client/control

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] client: exit nicely for --controller with no SPICE_XPI_SOCKET (#644292)

Ack! On 03/01/2011 04:43 PM, Uri Lublin wrote: When starting spicec with --controller, SPICE_XPI_SOCKET environment variable must be defined so spicec and the controller can be connected. --- client/controller.cpp |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/client

[Spice-devel] [PATCH] client: exit nicely for --controller with no SPICE_XPI_SOCKET (#644292)

When starting spicec with --controller, SPICE_XPI_SOCKET environment variable must be defined so spicec and the controller can be connected. --- client/controller.cpp |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/client/controller.cpp b/client/controller.cpp index 329c13

Re: [Spice-devel] [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs supportive features

On 03/01/2011 09:25 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 03/01/2011 02:40 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On Mar 1, 2011 7:07 AM, "Dor Laor" mailto:dl...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 02/28/2011 07:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 28, 2011 10:44 AM, "Jes Sorensen" mailto:jes.soren...@redhat.com> >>

Re: [Spice-devel] [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs supportive features

On 03/01/2011 02:40 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On Mar 1, 2011 7:07 AM, "Dor Laor" mailto:dl...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 02/28/2011 07:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 28, 2011 10:44 AM, "Jes Sorensen" mailto:jes.soren...@redhat.com> >>

Re: [Spice-devel] smartcard usage

On 03/01/2011 08:13 AM, william wrote: On 03/01/2011 12:23 AM, Robert Relyea wrote: On 02/28/2011 08:34 AM, william wrote: On 02/26/2011 08:49 PM, Alon Levy wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:06:33PM +0100, william wrote: On 02/24/2011 08:10 PM, Alon Levy wrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:46: