Re: [Spice-devel] Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

2013-02-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:17:25PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange > wrote: > > FYI libvirt Fedora packages no longer carry patches as a general rule. > > Instead for libvirt we aim to provide stable release branches with > > trivial f

Re: [Spice-devel] Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

2013-02-13 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > FYI libvirt Fedora packages no longer carry patches as a general rule. > Instead for libvirt we aim to provide stable release branches with > trivial fixes applied. This ensures that the stable packages are > easily available to ever

Re: [Spice-devel] Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

2013-02-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:23:12PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Christophe Fergeau > > wrote: > > > > > > After this thread and the spice-gtk 0.17 release, I'm _very_ surprised to > > > s

Re: [Spice-devel] Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

2013-02-13 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:49:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Christophe Fergeau > wrote: > > In my opinion, we should follow what libvirt does here, send the patch to > > the list with a note indicating that it has already been pushed to fix the > > build.

Re: [Spice-devel] Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

2013-02-13 Thread Marc-André Lureau
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > In my opinion, we should follow what libvirt does here, send the patch to > the list with a note indicating that it has already been pushed to fix the > build. > This is very helpful to let others know about such fixes. People have been

Re: [Spice-devel] Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

2013-02-13 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:23:12PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Christophe Fergeau > wrote: > > > > After this thread and the spice-gtk 0.17 release, I'm _very_ surprised to > > see some patches on top of the F18 and rawhide package, including (at > > least)

[Spice-devel] spice-gtk release v0.18

2013-02-13 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hello! The Spice team is pleased to release a new spice-gtk version: - Build fix with Gtk+ unstable. - MinGW build fixes with old headers - Fix USB coldplug race - Fixes rhbz#908057 http://spice-space.org/download/gtk/spice-gtk-0.18.tar.bz2 md5sum: bcd73f857d137bca8e24380e8f7977d2 sha1sum: 8654

Re: [Spice-devel] Packaging spice-html5

2013-02-13 Thread Jeremy White
> Then I'll try submitting the RPM that now builds to the Fedora project. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793 Wish me luck . Cheers, Jeremy ___ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mail

Re: [Spice-devel] Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

2013-02-13 Thread Marc-André Lureau
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > After this thread and the spice-gtk 0.17 release, I'm _very_ surprised to > see some patches on top of the F18 and rawhide package, including (at > least) one patch which is mandatory to build spice-gtk with newer gtk+ > versions. jhbu

Re: [Spice-devel] Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

2013-02-13 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:48:32PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > The fedora package was updated in fedora/koji for the reporter to > check if it solves his > problem, before doing the release which was planned to come quickly > after, as it did. There was only a few days between the two release

[Spice-devel] Rotate graphical output of vm

2013-02-13 Thread Dennis Böck
Dear Spice-list, I would like to rotate the graphical output of a vm. I tried it with a Fedora 18 and OpenSuse 12.2 guest and: xrandr -o left, but I got the error message: X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) Major opcode of failed request: 139 (RANDR) Minor opcod

Re: [Spice-devel] Higher (quadratical) resolution

2013-02-13 Thread Dennis Böck
Hi David, installing all updates for Fedora 18 didn't help, but enabling the "Test Updates" repository did help - so obviously this feature is still not officially released. Now the output of xrandr looks like this: Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2560 x 1600, maximum 8192 x 8192 qxl-0 con

[Spice-devel] codec passthrough and guest ram surface allocation status

2013-02-13 Thread Davide Canova
I'm interested in these two proposed features: http://spice-space.org/page/Features/CodecPassthrough http://spice-space.org/page/Features/GuestRamSurfaceAllocation I wanted to ask if anyone is working on them or planning to work on them at the moment, just in case the wiki is not up to date. Also