Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH qxl-wddm-dod] Send HIDE command when pointer is not visible

I'm pretty sure Windows won't call SetPointerShape when it hides the hardware pointer, so you have to catch it in SetPointerPosition. But yes, you probably could send the HIDE command just once. El dom, 20-11-2016 a las 16:18 +0200, Yuri Benditovich escribió: > Is this a best idea to send down

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH qxl-wddm-dod] Send HIDE command when pointer is not visible

Is this a best idea to send down HIDE command on each SetPointerPosition? I'd like to check it - may be we can filter it better on SetPointerShape? On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > From: Javier Celaya > > This avoid

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH xf86-video-qxl] Adjust xspice_wakeup_handler() prototype for building xspice with server 1.19

On 04.10.2016 14:41, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 03-10-16 12:04, Christophe Fergeau wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 01:03:01PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede >>> --- >>> src/spiceqxl_main_loop.c | 4 >>> 1 file changed, 4