ack
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
If the client advertises the SASL cap, it means it guarantees it will be
able to use SASL if the server supports, and that it does not need a valid
SpiceLinkReply::pub_key field when using SASL.
When the
No taker for a review ?
Christophe
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:54:08PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
If the client advertises the SASL cap, it means it guarantees it will be
able to use SASL if the server supports, and that it does not need a valid
SpiceLinkReply::pub_key field when using
If the client advertises the SASL cap, it means it guarantees it will be
able to use SASL if the server supports, and that it does not need a valid
SpiceLinkReply::pub_key field when using SASL.
When the client cap is set, we thus don't need to create a RSA public key
if SASL is enabled server
